'Rocket:' Crosby has his crown back as league's best
Former Penguins winger Rick Tocchet goes one-on-one in the Trib's weekly "PuckSpeak" Sunday interview.
Q: Does Chicago's regular-season success remind you of the '93 Penguins that won 17 in a row but lost in the playoffs?
A: Yes, and it is something that I think about. This is great for the Hawks and the league right now. But it doesn't really matter what kind of a streak you can put up. They will be judged by how they play in the postseason. The Stanley Cup is the paramount thing.
Q: Scotty Bowman played his stars a ton during the streak in '93. Is Chicago wise to roll four lines and stay fresh?
A: They are, but different situations. We won the Cup the year before. Chicago didn't. Big difference. They shouldn't be tired.
Q: Would you have enjoyed playing on a line with Sidney Crosby?
A: Oh, wow. Yeah. Obviously. I thought Thursday's game in Philly was so impressive. I don't think people are talking enough about what Sid is doing right now. That Philly game told me that Crosby has the crown back as the best player in the game. He willed them to win that game. He was setting people up for empty nets. I don't know how he made some of the plays that I saw. What leadership. I love Steven Stamkos, but Sid is the best right now. Pascal Dupuis is a good player, but he must wake up every day and say, "Oh, Lord, I get to play with this guy."
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.