Share This Page
NHL

NHL notebook: Rangers' Staal sidelined with eye injury

| Wednesday, March 6, 2013, 7:51 p.m.

• New York Rangers defenseman Marc Staal will be sidelined indefinitely after being hit in the eye with a puck, the team said. An ophthalmologist and a maxillofacial surgeon who examined Staal on Wednesday are optimistic that the 27-year-old will make a full recovery, the Rangers said in an emailed release. Staal was forced to leave Tuesday night's 4-2 win over Philadelphia during the third period after a slap shot by the Flyers' Kimmo Timonen was deflected upward and struck Staal in the right eye. He has two goals and nine assists in 21 games this season.

• The Rangers added veteran defenseman Roman Hamrlik to the roster while they wait to find out the severity of Staal's eye injury. New York claimed the 38-year-old Hamrlik off waivers from the Washington Capitals on Wednesday. Hamrlik, the active leader with 1,383 NHL games played, was waived by the Capitals on Tuesday after playing in only four games this season. He is in the final season of a two-year, $7 million contract.

• Blackhawks forward Marian Hossa was out of the lineup against Colorado because of an upper-body injury. Hossa was scratched just before Wednesday night's game. Hossa has 10 goals and eight assists this season.

• Surgery had been weighing on Panthers center Stephen Weiss' mind for more than a year. An MRI last year revealed some troubling things. He had undergone surgery on his right wrist at the end of the 2008-09 season and was willing to deal with soreness the rest of his career if it meant avoiding a second procedure on the wrist. After having another MRI and consulting with specialists Monday, though, Weiss decided to have season-ending surgery. Weiss said the procedure will be done Tuesday in Cleveland by Dr. Thomas Graham.

— Wire reports

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.