Rangers, McDonagh stay positive despite difficulties
New York Rangers defenseman Ryan McDonagh goes one-on-one with the Trib:
Q: How frustrated are you by the season?
A: We're competitive as a group. We wanted to build on what we did last season, and it hasn't gone the way we wanted it to go. But we're trying to stay positive. We just have to stick together. We still have a lot of confidence in the things that we're doing here. We really do. We just need to keep positive.
Q: Have you been able to identify anything in particular that has been a problem this season?
A: We've had more consistent minutes lately in our games, actually. We've been getting close to capitalizing. It just seems like that one time we have a breakdown, the puck is ending up in our net. We're just doing our best to work hard and stay confident. That's all we can do, honestly.
Q: The Penguins, especially Sidney Crosby, are on a roll. What are they doing now that they didn't do earlier in the season?
A: We played them early on. We haven't seen them in a while. Obviously, they're a good team, and I'm sure they're feeling pretty confident. We just try to focus on us.
Q: How much easier is it playing the Penguins when Evgeni Malkin is out of the lineup?
A: I don't think it changes how you view them. They've got the depth up front and a lot of talent on the back end. Obviously, Malkin is a huge asset to their team, but it's not like they aren't still a good team. They still have a lot of talent and do a lot of great things out there. Handling them is never an easy thing. We know how good they are.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.