NHL notebook: Leafs forward Lupul suspended for 2 games
• The NHL suspended Maple Leafs forward Joffrey Lupul for two games without pay for an illegal check to the head of Lightning defenseman Victor Hedman. The league's department of player safety issued the ruling while Toronto prepared to play Thursday at Buffalo. The hit occurred a day earlier in the third period of Toronto's 4-2 win. The suspension will cost Lupul about $46,000 in salary.
• The Hurricanes activated forward Tuomo Ruutu from the injured non-roster list and claimed former first-round draft pick Zach Boychuk off waivers. The team also placed defenseman Joe Corvo on injured reserve retroactive to March 16. Ruutu will make his season debut after sitting out since having hip surgery in December. The Hurricanes waived Boychuk in January for the purpose of sending him to their AHL affiliate in Charlotte, but he was claimed by the Penguins. After the Penguins waived him in February, he was claimed by Nashville.
• President Barack Obama will honor two championship sports teams from California at the White House on Tuesday. Obama will hold a ceremony to welcome the Stanley Cup champion Kings. He'll also honor the LA Galaxy, the championship MLS team. The White House said the teams will head to the South Lawn after the ceremony to host an exercise clinic for children.
• Defenseman Andrej Sustr, an undrafted free agent who just completed his third season with Nebraska-Omaha, signed a two-year entry-level deal with the Lightning, according to NHL.com.
• The Flyers agreed to terms with college free agent Kyle Flanagan on a one-year entry-level contract, NHL.com reported. The center from St. Lawrence University was named a finalist for the Hobey Baker Award as the top collegiate player this season.
— Wire reports
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.