Puckspeak: Q&A with Bill Guerin
Penguins player developement coach Bill Guerin talks about the Penguins' new faces, team chemistry and being a part of the Pens' organization.
Q: What advice would you give Jarome Iginla about playing with Sidney Crosby and Evgeni Malkin?
A: First of all, he doesn't need much advice from me. If I were to give him advice, I'd say be yourself and play your game. He's a helluva hockey player. He's had great success doing his thing. He needs to continue that. The mix is good. From what he offers to what they offer, it's a good match. It's hard coming to a new team. You want to please everybody. But the best thing to do is to be yourself and play your game.
Q: How exciting is it for you to still play a role in this organization?
A:For me, it's fantastic. I love it here. That's why I came back. I love this organization. It's top-notch from the top on down. I'm learning a lot from a lot of great people. (General manager Ray (Shero) and (assistant GM) Jason (Botterill) put me in a lot of great positions to see what happens behind the scenes. I've learned so much in the time I've been here.
Q: Is developing chemistry going to be an issue for the Penguins with all the new faces?
A: I don't have any concerns. Jarome, Brenden (Morrow) and Douglas (Murray) are all coming from one organization. Jussi (Jokinen) has played on a couple. But they've all played on different teams, they've all played in World Cups and in the Olympics. They've had great success.
Q: Do you wish you could play with the Penguins as currently constructed?
A: Do I ever. It kills me every day. But it's great to look out there and see the group of guys that Ray has put together. But yes, it kills me. If I could go out there and play with those guys, it would be unbelievable.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.