ShareThis Page

Puckspeak: Lightning center Stamkos says scoring title doesn't matter

| Saturday, April 13, 2013, 11:51 p.m.

Trib reporter Josh Yohe talks to Lightning center Steven Stamkos about his pursuit of the scoring title and the team's performance this season.

Q: Would winning the scoring title take the sting off what has been a disappointing season?

A: No, not at all. I'm not worried about that stuff right now. I'm really not. We just want to finish these last nine games as well as we can. Whatever happens, happens. I don't spend a lot of time thinking about the scoring title, to be honest with you.

Q: How would you assess the way you've played this season?

A: I'm not pleased. You should be able to do more than what you've done if your team isn't in a playoff spot. Everyone on our team would probably say that and I'm no different. I've wanted to improve in different areas, but I still can do a lot better on a lot of different things. I want to be better for our team.

Q: If you win the scoring title, many will say it was by default because of Sidney Crosby's injury. Is this awkward for you?

A: Well, it's obviously a tough thing for Sid. You never want to see him out of the game. I'm not worried about the scoring title. I just want Sid to get healthy, just like everyone else in the league does. You don't want to see him out of the game, especially when you consider all the time that he's missed over the past few years. I'm not worried about the scoring race. You just don't want to see a player of his caliber missing games like this. He's so good for the game. It's always a bad thing when he's out of the lineup and it's always such a challenge to play against him.

Q: Have you given up hope on making the playoffs?

A: Not until we're mathematically out of it. We're all professionals here and we all try to keep that belief that we have a chance. We have tough games coming up, but we just have to believe that we can win them all.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.