NHL roundup: Bruins pound struggling 'Canes
BOSTON — Brad Marchand scored two goals, and Tuukka Rask stopped 40 shots, leading the Bruins to a 6-2 victory over the struggling Hurricanes on Monday night.
Rich Peverley, Andrew Ference, Jordan Caron and Nathan Horton each added a goal, and defenseman Dennis Seidenberg established a career-high with three assists for Boston, which moved a point behind Montreal in the Northeast Division.
The Bruins won for the fourth time in five games by scoring a season-high in goals after dropping a 2-1 decision at the rival Canadiens on Saturday.
Maple Leafs 4, Rangers 3 — In Toronto, Phil Kessel scored twice to lead Toronto in the first game of an important home-and-home series between the Eastern Conference rivals.
Toronto (22-13-4) remained fifth in the Eastern Conference standings.
The Rangers (19-16-4) remain tied with the idle Islanders for seventh in the Eastern Conference with 42 points.
Ducks 2, Oilers 1 — In Anaheim, Calif., Radek Dvorak scored two goals, Jonas Hiller made 27 saves after missing four games because of an illness, and Anaheim inched closer to the Pacific Division title.
Canucks 2, Coyotes 0 — In Vancouver, British Columbia, Ryan Kesler scored, Dam Hamhuis added an empty-netter, and Cory Schneider made 19 saves to lead Vancouver.
Flames 3, Avalanche 1 — In Denver, Mike Cammalleri broke a second-period tie, and Joey MacDonald stopped 39 shots, helping the Flames snap a 13-game road winless streak.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.