NHL playoff system has its flaws
The Penguins won the Atlantic Division title, and the top spot in the East appears a formality.
The Blackhawks have the Central Division championship and the No. 1 seed in the West all within reach.
Holding the top seeds entering the playoffs are no guarantee they'll meet in the Stanley Cup Finals, of course. But home ice is usually a nice advantage during a rugged postseason. The top four teams in each conference deserve the appropriate reward for their consistency over a long — or lockout-shortened — season.
But there's always one weird exception.
In the NHL, teams can get rewarded with home ice even with a worse record and fewer points than their opponent.
Division winners are seeded in the top three spots for the postseason ahead of teams with whopping point totals.
In the East, that means Southeast leader Washington (44 points) is placed ahead of Toronto (49 points) in the standings. If conference seeding was based solely on points, the playoff race would be a bit more fair. The Capitals would be in the mix with Ottawa, the New York Islanders and Rangers (44 points each) for the eighth and final spot, playing down the stretch for a postseason berth, not looking toward home ice.
Should Alexander Ovechkin and the surging Capitals slip, Winnipeg could pounce and take advantage of the inane rule.
The Jets-Capitals game April 23 could be the difference in seed No. 3 or No. 8 — or maybe no seed at all and a date with the golf course.
The NHL has this system because it wants to make division races matter, and also because of an unbalanced schedule that is on its last days with realignment on the way.
The new format goes into effect next season and will feature two eight-team divisions in the Eastern Conference, including the Red Wings and Blue Jackets moving over from the West. The Jets will now be part of a Western Conference that's made up of two seven-team divisions.
The new format also creates changes in determining the 16-team playoff field. The top three teams in each division will qualify for the postseason. The next two teams with the best records in each conference will then earn wild-card berths.
That will make it more difficult for teams to qualify in the East, because it will have two more clubs than the West competing for eight berths.
Problems for another year. Right now, it's about getting in — any way you can.
Washington (five straight wins) and Winnipeg (two straight) understand that, and they are playing like it. After all, the label of that No. 3 seed would allow one of them to dodge a likely date with the streaking Penguins in Round 1. Stay in third, and there's a better chance of advancing.
But once the playoffs start, often times that discrepancy in talent and point production filters out, regardless of seed. Last year, for instance, Florida snagged that No. 3 seed — and home ice — and still lost in the first round to No. 6 New Jersey.
“I think anyone who's competitive, you might not watch it every day, but you kind of have a good feel for it,” Penguins defenseman Brooks Orpik said of the race. “I think we've positioned ourselves now that we don't have to worry about trying to get every single little point to get in, which is good.”
The Penguins clinched the Atlantic Division title by beating the free-falling Hurricanes, 5-3, on Tuesday. The Penguins became the first team in the NHL to claim a division crown in this shortened season.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.