ShareThis Page

Breaking down the Eastern Conference playoff matchups

| Tuesday, April 30, 2013, 12:01 a.m.

No. 1 Penguins vs. No. 8 New York Islanders

The Penguins enter the postseason nearing 100 percent health and are overwhelming favorites to win the Eastern Conference. Their exceptional depth and skill level is matched by a desire to overcome last year's playoff disappointment. Injuries are probably the only thing that could derail them.

Led by talented center John Tavares, the Islanders are a gifted offensive team but are not imposing defensively. Few of their players have playoff experience. The Penguins, meanwhile, boast 10 Stanley Cup winners and a wealth of veterans. Goalie Evgeni Nabokov be exceptional for the Islanders to have a chance.

Offense – Penguins

Defense – Penguins

Power play – Penguins

Penalty kill – Penguins

Goaltending – Penguins

Series winner: Penguins in 5

No. 2 Montreal Canadiens vs. No. 7 Ottawa Senators

Two of the most surprising teams in the NHL, neither the Canadiens nor Senators enter the postseason playing particularly well. Montreal is one of the league's youngest teams but has been fairly consistent throughout the season. The Canadiens will rely heavily on goaltender Carey Price.

Ottawa is one of the NHL's stingiest teams but struggles offensively without injured center Jason Spezza. Goaltender Craig Anderson has been terrific for the Senators, and star defenseman Erik Karlsson is back in the lineup after an Achilles injury threatened to end his season. Expect a tight series.

Offense – Canadiens

Defense – Senators

Power play – Canadiens

Penalty kill – Senators

Goaltending – Canadiens

Series winner: Canadiens in 7

No. 3 Washington Capitals vs. No. 6 New York Rangers

The Capitals are suddenly alive and well following a dreadful start to the season. Washington's forwards are among the more talented and diverse in the NHL. The resurgent Alex Ovechkin leads a group that includes Nicklas Backstrom, Mike Ribeiro and Troy Brouwer. The Capitals did beat up on a weak Southeast Division, making them difficult to handicap.

Figuring out the Rangers isn't simple, either. They've been lifeless most of the season but have played with more of an edge since trading star sniper Marian Gaborik. The Rangers are offensively limited but, as long as they employ goaltender Henrik Lundqvist, will remain an x-factor in the Eastern Conference.

Offense – Capitals

Defense – Rangers

Power play – Capitals

Penalty kill – Rangers

Goaltending - Rangers

Series winner: Rangers in 7

No. 4 Boston vs. No. 5 Toronto

This should become one of the most compelling first-round series. Boston remains formidable on paper and is among the NHL's finest defensive teams. However, the Bruins have been sluggish for more than a month and are struggling offensively. Milan Lucic has been a healthy scratch in recent games.

Toronto is a team with holes, but the Maple Leafs also possess a youthful exuberance that could serve them well. Playing in the postseason for the first time in nine years, the Maple Leafs are a dynamic offensive team largely because of centers Nazem Kadri and Phil Kessel. Goalie James Reimer has been superb.

Offense – Maple Leafs

Defense – Bruins

Power play – Maple Leafs

Penalty kill – Bruins

Goaltending – Maple Leafs

Series winner: Maple Leafs in 6

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.