ShareThis Page

Breaking down the Western Conference playoff matchups

| Tuesday, April 30, 2013, 12:01 a.m.
Corey Crawford #50 of the Chicago Blackhawks keeps an eye on the play during the game against the Edmonton Oilers at Rexall Place on April 24, 2013 in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Getty Images
Corey Crawford #50 of the Chicago Blackhawks keeps an eye on the play during the game against the Edmonton Oilers at Rexall Place on April 24, 2013 in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

No. 1 Chicago vs. No. 8 Minnesota

This series will not last long. Chicago, along with the Penguins, has simply dominated the league this season and is well balanced. Led by stars Jonathan Toews, Patrick Kane and Marian Hossa — along with a host of talented players — the Blackhawks seem destined to meet the Penguins in what could be a classic Stanley Cup Final.

Minnesota, meanwhile, has struggled down the stretch and barely reached the postseason. Zach Parise and Ryan Suter have been good in their first season with the Wild, but there is absolutely no reason to think Minnesota can hang around with the mighty Blackhawks.

Offense – Blackhawks

Defense – Blackhawks

Power play – Blackhawks

Penalty kill – Blackhawks

Goaltending – Blackhawks

Series winner: Blackhawks in 4

No. 2 Anaheim vs. No. 7 Detroit

Anaheim has been a consistent team this season, largely playing in the Blackhawks' shadow. Few teams can match Anaheim's size and skill at forward, as Ryan Getzlaf, Bobby Ryan, Corey Perry and Teemu Selanne give the Ducks plenty of offense. Team defense could be an issue.

The Red Wings aren't really the Red Wings anymore, as their third and fourth lines — along with their blue line — are filled with ordinary players, which is quite a change from past seasons. Still, Jimmy Howard has been strong in net, and Henrik Zetterberg and Pavel Datsyuk are still terrific. Not a great matchup for Anaheim.

Offense – Anaheim

Defense – Detroit

Power play – Anaheim

Penalty kill – Detroit

Goaltending – Detroit

Series winner: Red Wings in 7

No. 3 Vancouver vs. No. 6 San Jose

This series showcases two talented, off-the-radar Western Conference teams. Vancouver is two years removed from losing Game 7 of the Stanley Cup Final at home and, thanks to a strong goaltending tandem and an abundance of forward skill, remains capable of making a run through the Western Conference.

San Jose started the season brilliantly, went cold for a month, and then rebounded to claim a playoff spot. Figuring out the Sharks isn't easy, but history says they will struggle in the Stanley Cup playoffs. Of course, Vancouver's playoff history isn't pretty, either.

Offense – Vancouver

Defense – Anaheim

Power play – Anaheim

Penalty kill – Vancouver

Goaltending - Vancouver

Series winner: Canucks in 6

No. 4 Los Angeles vs. No. 5 St. Louis

What a series. On paper, this should mark the NHL's finest first-round draw. Los Angeles is the defending Stanley Cup champion and, following its 16-3 romp to the Stanley Cup last season, remains a feared opponent. Goaltender Jonathan Quick has returned to form following a poor start as the Kings seek another title.

St. Louis has been energized during the past month and is a fast, physical team that rarely plays poor defensively because of the presence of head coach Ken Hitchcock. Short on household names, the Blues enter the playoffs red hot and are a stifling defensive team.

Offense – Kings

Defense – Blues

Power play – Kings

Penalty kill – Blues

Goaltending – Kings

Series winner: Kings in 7

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.