Whitehall's Gibson gets call to NHL
John Gibson has made it to the NHL.
A Whitehall native and Anaheim's second-round pick in the 2011 NHL Entry Draft, Gibson was recalled by the Ducks from Norfolk of the AHL on Friday.
Anaheim plays Saturday in Phoenix.
The Ducks are rich with goaltending at the NHL and AHL levels but decided to promote Gibson and send rookie Frederik Andersen to the minor leagues.
“Obviously I'm really excited right now,” Gibson said. “I just want to make the most of this opportunity.”
While in Pittsburgh in November, Anaheim coach Bruce Boudreau compared Gibson's future to that of a “supernova” and said he believes the 20-year-old goaltender has an opportunity to become “a real star in this league for a long time.”
Boudreau was in no mood to rush Gibson to the NHL. Given that goaltender Jonas Hiller has led the Ducks to an NHL-best 71 points so far this season, and because Boudreau believes goalies benefit from full seasons at the AHL, the Ducks haven't felt compelled to rush Gibson to the NHL.
Still, his performance has been difficult for Anaheim to ignore.
Gibson is 11-9-3 this season with a 2.61 goals-against average and a .915 percentage while leading the AHL with 700 saves.
Gibson last year led the U.S. to the gold medal at the World Junior Championships, garnering tournament MVP honors.
Local products Gibson, Brandon Saad (Blackhawks) and J.T. Miller (Rangers) all were drafted in 2011 and have made NHL rosters.
Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.