NHL notebook: League adjusts Devils' penalty for signing Kovalchuk
• The NHL reduced its penalty against the Devils for signing Ilya Kovalchuk in 2010. The Devils will keep the first-round draft pick they were scheduled to forfeit this year, and the league will reduce the $3 million fine assessed against the team for circumventing the NHL-NHLPA collective bargaining agreement. Kovalchuk, who had been acquired by the Devils in February 2010, became a free agent at the end of that season. New Jersey signed him to a 17-year, $102 million deal, but the league ruled what would have been the longest contract in NHL circumvented the salary cap and rejected it.
• The Stars will retire Mike Modano's No. 9. His number will be lifted to the rafters before the Dallas' game Saturday night against Minnesota, where he started his career as the No. 1 pick in 1988 before the franchise moved south five years later. Modano is the highest-scoring American-born player in NHL history with 561 goals, 813 assists and 1,374 points.
• The Red Wings retired defenseman Nicklas Lidstrom's No. 5 before Thursday's game against the Avalanche by hoisting his jersey to the rafters of Joe Louis Arena. Lidstrom was a seven-time Norris Trophy winner — second in NHL history to Bobby Orr's eight — and was a four-time Stanley Cup champion. He finished his career with 1,142 points and a plus-450 rating in 1,564 games.
• The Capitals recalled forward Chris Brown from Hershey of the AHL, two days after they acquired him in a trade with the Coyotes. The Capitals also re-assigned goaltender Philipp Grubauer to Hershey. The 23-year-old Brown played in six games with Phoenix this season.
— Wire reports
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.