Chicago defenseman Seabrook suspended for hit on St. Louis captain Backes
CHICAGO — The Chicago Blackhawks felt the repercussions of Brent Seabrook's hit on David Backes again Sunday. How it affects the rest of their playoff series against the St. Louis Blues remains to be seen.
Seabrook was suspended for three games by the NHL on his 29th birthday for his elbow to Backes' head late in the third period of St. Louis' 4-3 overtime win in Game 2.
Now, Chicago has to dig out of a 2-0 hole without one of its best defensemen in a rocky start to its Stanley Cup title defense.
“You need his size, you need his presence and experience and his leadership,” Blackhawks coach Joel Quenneville said before Seabrook's suspension was announced.
Seabrook received a five-minute major and game misconduct penalty after he hit Backes at 15:09 of the third. The Blues used the resulting power play to score the tying goal with 6.4 seconds left in regulation on Vladimir Tarasenko's wrist shot.
Backes had to be helped off the ice and did not return. The captain's status for Monday night's Game 3 is up in the air.
Backes and Seabrook were not made available to the media on the day off, but much of the talk centered on the hit anyway. The TV broadcast picked up someone taunting Backes in the aftermath of the big blow, but it was unclear if it was coming from the ice or the crowd in the corner where the play occurred.
Quenneville said he did not see or hear any players taunting Backes after he went down.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.