NHL notebook: Wild's Cooke apologizes for kneeing
ST. PAUL, Minn. — Wild left wing Matt Cooke apologized Thursday for the knee-to-knee hit on Tyson Barrie that sidelined the Avalanche defenseman for at least a month, saying he did not intend to injure him.
Cooke, a former Penguins winger, drew a seven-game suspension Wednesday from the NHL, removing him from the remainder of this first-round series and more.
“First and foremost, I want to say that I'm disappointed and sorry that Tyson Barrie can't play for the Colorado Avalanche tonight. I wish that he could,” Cooke said.
This is Cooke's sixth career suspension for various safety violations, bringing his total of games banned to 34, including playoffs.
Cooke also has been fined four times. This was his first suspension in more than three years.
Flyers make goalie switch
Steve Mason will start in goal Friday night when the Flyers host the Rangers in Game 4 of their first-round playoff series.
The Rangers lead the best-of-seven Eastern Conference series 2-1.
Ray Emery started the first three games for Mason, who sustained an upper-body injury April 12. Mason played the final 7:15 in a 4-1 loss Tuesday, stopping all three shots he faced.
Selke Trophy finalists
Anze Kopitar, Patrice Bergeron and Jonathan Toews are finalists for the NHL's Selke Trophy, awarded to the best defensive forward.
Kopitar appeared in all 82 Kings games and had the second-most ice time among forwards behind the Penguins' Sidney Crosby. Boston's Bergeron led the NHL in face-off wins (1,015). Chicago's Toews, who won the award last year, was fifth in the NHL in face-off wins (884).
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.