NHL notebook: Avalanche forward Duchene may return for Game 6
The Hurricanes are expected to announce Monday that Jim Rutherford will step down as general manager and be replaced by ex-Penguins player Ron Francis, the (Raleigh) News and Observer reported Sunday night.
The Hurricanes announced a press conference for noon Monday at PNC Arena regarding hockey operations.
Francis is the Hurricanes' vice president of hockey operations and is a former team captain. He has also been an associate coach.
Francis won the Stanley Cup with the Penguins in 1991 and '92. He played for them over eight seasons.
Avs' Duchene could play
The Avalanche may get back regular-season leading scorer Matt Duchene for Game 6 against the Wild on Monday in the Western Conference first-round series, NHL.com reported.
Avalanche coach Patrick Roy said Duchene's status will be determined after Monday's morning skate.
Duchene (23 goals, 47 assists) hasn't played since injuring the MCL in his left knee in late March. The Avalanche lead the best-of-seven series 3-2.
Vlasic may sit for Sharks
The Sharks could be without key defenseman Marc-Edouard Vlasic for Game 6 of their Western Conference first-round series with the Kings.
Vlasic didn't practice Sunday after getting injured in the first period of Game 5 for the Sharks, who have lost the past two games after taking a 3-0 lead in the series.
The Kings are trying to become just the fourth team in NHL history to advance from a three-game deficit.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.