NHL notebook: Hurricanes tab former Penguin Francis as new GM
Jim Rutherford is stepping down as general manager of the Hurricanes, and the team promoted Hall of Fame player Ron Francis to replace him.
Rutherford, 65, spent two decades as the club's GM. He helped shepherd its move from Hartford to North Carolina. He assembled the teams that won one Stanley Cup, played for another and reached the Eastern Conference final in 2009.
Francis, who played for the Penguins from 1991-98, has been the team's vice president of operations since June 2012. Rutherford also played for the Penguins (1971-74).
Norris Trophy finalists
Boston's Zdeno Chara, Chicago's Duncan Keith and Nashville's Shea Weber are finalists for the Norris Trophy, given annually to the NHL's best defenseman. Chara won the award in 2009. The Bruins' captain had 17 goals and a plus-25 rating this past season. Keith finished first among defensemen in assists with 55 and second in points with 61. He won the Norris in 2010. Weber had 33 assists and led all blue-liners with 23 goals.
Capitals' future bright?
George McPhee said he could sense the Capitals were going to get rid of him as general manager, but he thinks the team is set up to reach the Stanley Cup finals “sometime in the next three years.”
Meeting with the media two days after being told his contract would not be renewed after 17 years as GM, McPhee declined to answer questions about Alex Ovechkin or Adam Oates, who was fired as coach.
Source: Flames pick GM
A league official familiar with the deal said the Flames will name Coyotes assistant general manager Brad Treliving as their GM.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.