NHL notebook: Blackhawks center Shaw questionable for Game 2
Blackhawks center Andrew Shaw is questionable for Game 2 of the Western Conference semifinals against the Wild on Sunday because of a lower-body injury.
Coach Joel Quenneville said Saturday he doesn't expect Shaw to be out for an extended period.
Shaw was injured in Friday's series-opening win; it was not clear when he was hurt.
He left the bench and missed the final eight minutes of the first period. The Blackhawks announced at the start of the second that he would not return.
Shaw had two goals and two assists in Chicago's first-round series against St. Louis.
• Wild coach Mike Yeo said there is no change to Darcy Kuemper's status and added that the goalie wasn't in Chicago, meaning IIya Bryzgalov likely will start Game 2. Kuemper is sidelined by an upper-body injury.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.