NHL notebook: Canucks expected to announce GM this week
The Vancouver Canucks are expected to name Jim Benning their general manager later this week, according to a report by TSN's Darren Dreger.
Benning, 51, serves as assistant GM of the Bruins, a position he has held since 2006. He won the Stanley Cup with them in 2011.
Benning played the final 241 games of his NHL career over parts of four seasons with the Canucks from 1986-1990. He was the sixth pick in the 1981 NHL Draft by the Maple Leafs and played parts of six seasons with them, scoring a career-best 12 goals and 51 points during the 1983-84 season.
After retiring, he worked as a scout for the Ducks and Sabres He spent six years starting in 1998 as Buffalo's director of amateur scouting.
Satan announces retirement
Miroslav Satan a Stanley Cup champion with the Penguins and two-time NHL All-Star, announced his retirement Tuesday from hockey.
Satan, 39, made the announcement after his final game for Slovakia, a 4-3 victory over Denmark in the preliminary round of the 2014 IIHF World Championship in Minsk, Belarus.
“I hardly believe it, but I am not going to change my word. I am convinced that this is the right decision (to quit),” Satan said.
Satan played 1,050 games over 14 NHL seasons, producing 363 goals and 372 assists (735 points) with the Oilers, Sabres, Islanders, Penguins and Bruins. He played 86 playoff games and had 21 goals and 33 assists (54 points), winning the Stanley Cup with the Penguins in 2009.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.