ShareThis Page

Q&A: 2015 NHL top prospect Connor McDavid

| Sunday, June 29, 2014, 9:42 p.m.
Connor McDavid, shown with Canada's junior national team, is hockey's most hyped prospect since Sidney Crosby.
Getty Images
Connor McDavid, shown with Canada's junior national team, is hockey's most hyped prospect since Sidney Crosby.

Numerous players could have been selected first overall in the NHL Entry Draft over the weekend.

That won't be the case next year, when Connor McDavid will be the top pick.

He is hockey's most hyped prospect since his idol, Sidney Crosby, was drafted by the Penguins in 2005. McDavid, a Toronto native who immediately became an Ontario Hockey League sensation two years ago, has breathed life into the Erie economy while becoming a box office attraction for the OHL's Otters. When asked about McDavid's game in a 2012 interview, Crosby said, “He reminds me of myself.”

McDavid sat down with the Tribune-Review for a Q&A session with one year remaining before he becomes property of an NHL team.

Q: You're a year away from playing against Sidney Crosby and the rest of the NHL. Can you believe it?

A: No, I really can't believe it. It seems like only yesterday when I first started in the OHL. It's hard to believe that it's been a couple of years now. And it's even crazier to think that, in a little more than a year, I could be playing against people like Sid. Wow. But it's been a heck of a ride for me so far. I've enjoyed it very much.

Q: You're the presumed top pick next year. Will you be paying attention to the bottom of the standings?

A: Honestly, no. I don't want to get distracted by that kind of stuff. And you never know what's going to happen, anyway. So I don't think there's any good in doing that.

Q: You're a kid from Toronto. Is playing for the Leafs the ideal situation for you?

A: I can honestly say that playing for the Leafs would be a dream come true. I mean, that would be crazy. It's crazy to even think about. It would definitely be a dream to wear the Leafs colors. But you don't know what's going to happen between now and then, so I really don't think about it that much. I'm sure I'll be happy playing in the NHL, no matter where I end up.

Q: Your draft is in Florida. Nothing says hockey like Florida, right?

A: I'm actually looking forward to it. It's going to be a nice time. But maybe we're getting ahead of ourselves a little bit (laughs). It's probably going to be a blessing to have the draft in such a nice place like Florida.

Q: You've got a reputation for being a nice person off the ice. How important is that to you?

A: Extremely. Hockey is such a small part of life. It's a couple hours out of the day. Being a good person off the ice, in my opinion, is far more important. I try to be the best person I can be every day. I love hockey and it's a big part of my life, but it's not who I am.

Q: You received a big taste of pressure in the World Juniors last season. Good experience?

A: It was an experience unlike anything I've ever experienced. There is a ton of pressure. But that's OK. I like playing under that kind of pressure and in those conditions. I wish it would have gone better, but it was definitely a good experience for me.

Q: What parts of your game still need work?

A: My defense. Definitely. I've watched enough NHL games to know that, if you want to be good in that league, you had better play good defense. It seems like everyone in the NHL plays well defensively. So yeah, that's a big thing for me.

Q: Summer plans?

A: Just working out with Gary (Roberts). Obviously training with Gary and all those guys (NHL players like Steven Stamkos and James Neal) has been a big deal. Seeing people like that and how they train is a good thing for me.

Josh Yohe is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @JoshYohe_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.