NHL notebook: Wild reportedly interested in Iginla, Vanek
• NHL.com reported the Wild have been in contact with free-agent forwards Jarome Iginla and Thomas Vanek. Iginla, who turns 37 on Tuesday, scored 30 goals and 61 points with the Bruins last season. The Bruins would like to sign Iginla but might not be able to fit him in under the NHL salary cap of $69 million. Iginla played 13 games with the Penguins in 2012-13, scoring five goals and 11 points. Vanek, who lives in Minnesota in the offseason, had 27 goals and 68 points for three teams in 2013-14.
• “Hockey Night in Canada” reported the Panthers placed defenseman and captain Ed Jovanoski, 38, on unconditional waivers and plan to buy out the final year of his contract. Jovanoski, a six-time All-Star, is scheduled to make $4 million in 2014-15. He had five points (one goal, four assists) in 37 games with the Panthers last season. Jovanoski, who made his NHL debut in 1995-96, has 137 goals and 363 assists in 1,128 games with the Panthers, Canucks and Coyotes.
• The Sabres bought out defenseman Christian Ehrhoff's contract, making him an unrestricted free agent. Ehrhoff signed a 10-year, $40 million contract with the Sabres in 2011. He made $18 million over the first two years of the deal. Ehrhoff, 31, has 313 career points in 692 games. He had 33 points in 79 games last season. Ehrhoff entered the NHL as a fourth-round pick of the Sharks in 2001. He has played for the Sharks, Sabres and Canucks.
• Capitals coach Barry Trotz told CSN Washington that Alex Ovechkin will start training camp as a right wing, but he could switch sides if he needs a boost in production. Ovechkin moved to right wing two seasons ago. He led the NHL with 51 goals but had a minus-35 rating last season. Trotz said increasing Ovechkin's retreat into the defensive zone should improve both statistics.
— Wire reports
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.