NHL notebook: AHL changes rules for OT, fighting
• The AHL approved rule changes to overtime and for fighting penalties. The changes will take effect for the 2014-15 season. Sudden-death overtime will be seven minutes during the regular season. Teams will change ends at the start of overtime and play 4 on 4 at full strength until the first whistle after three minutes of play, at which time teams will play 3 on 3 for the duration of the extra session. If the game is still tied after overtime, the winner will be determined by a three-player shootout. Also, an automatic game misconduct will be given to any player assessed two major penalties for fighting or three major penalties for any infraction in the same game.
• The Blues re-signed forward Steve Ott to a two-year contract. The 31-year-old Ott, who was acquired in the Ryan Miller deal from Buffalo, had three assists and 37 penalty minutes in 23 regular-season games. In six playoff games, he added two assists and 14 penalty minutes. Ott had been the Sabres' captain before the trade Feb. 28.
• The Red Wings re-signed left wing Daniel Cleary to a one-year contract. The 35-year-old Cleary finished last season with four goals, four assists and 53 penalty minutes in 52 games. Cleary has spent the past nine seasons with the Red Wings, helping them win the Stanley Cup in 2008.
• The Maple Leafs signed forward Trevor Smith to a one-year contract and defenseman Rinat Valiev to a three-year entry-level deal. Smith played 28 games for the Maple Leafs last season, getting nine points (four goals, five assists) with four penalty minutes. Valiev was selected in the third round of the recent draft.
• The Sharks re-signed unrestricted free agent defenseman Scott Hannan to a one-year contract. The 35-year-old Hannan played 56 games last season with three goals and nine assists.
— Wire reports
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.