U.S. tops medals chart, but Britain has reason to cheer
TribLIVE Sports Videos
LONDON — Most medals, most golds. The U.S. got what it wanted from these Olympics.
So did Britain, riding the wave of home-field advantage for its best Olympic showing in more than a century. Some of that may have come at the expense of China, which finished only five medals ahead of Russia.
The U.S. was best, but the success stories from London truly spanned the globe.
The final numbers: 104 medals for the United States, 46 of them gold, their highest total at a “road” Olympics. China won 87 medals, 38 of them gold, down from what it did as the home team in 2008. Britain won 29 golds, third-most of any nation, and 65 overall — fourth in that category behind Russia, a winner of 82 medals, 24 gold.
Grenada had its first gold medalist, and six other nations sent athletes to the podium for the first time. Australia took another step back in its Olympic freefall after a scintillating show in Sydney 12 years ago.
In all, 85 nations won something in London, from the U.S. to Tajikistan and dozens of points in between.
“We are immensely proud of the success that our athletes had in London,” U.S. Olympic Committee CEO Scott Blackmun said.
With good reason. Red, white and blue was everywhere in London. And that's not just the color scheme of the U.S. flag but the Union Jack, too. The hosts delivered on a promise of greatness in 2012 — and possibly set the stage for continued success.
“What I've witnessed in the last couple of weeks has been both uplifting and energizing,” London Games chief Sebastian Coe said.
The Americans' 46 golds in London were one more than the haul from Paris in 1924 and Mexico City in 1968. They won 83 golds (174 overall) at the 1984 Los Angeles Games, boycotted by most of the Soviet bloc countries, and 78 golds (a whopping 239 overall) at the 1904 St. Louis Games, when U.S. athletes won roughly seven out of every eight medals.
Different eras, different dynamics. But by any measure, 2012 will be considered a booming success for the U.S.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Dispute over iconic McKeesport lounge headed back to court
- Judge reduces charges against McKeesport assault suspects
- Kennywood to boost security in light of scuffle
- Starkey: Pirates’ trade of Snider still reeks
- Allegheny Health Network’s $600M plan to expand reach depends on Highmark
- Pitt joins Giant Eagle, sets goal to put more disabled on payroll
- Pirates pitcher Cole climbing list with each consecutive win
- Gorman: Lack of WPIAL alums selected a troubling NFL trend?
- Continued education for therapists key to TEIS success
- Allegheny County restaurant grading proposal might get an ‘F’
- McDonald’s fast-food restaurant chain begins plan for revival