Share This Page

Kovacevic: Sochi stumbling? Don't buy it

| Thursday, Feb. 6, 2014, 4:56 p.m.
The Bogatyr hotel is illuminated near the Olympic Park in Sochi, Russia, early Thursday morning, Feb. 6, 2014, prior to the start of the 2014 Winter Olympics.
A construction worker steps over a puddle in a lot being prepared to be turned into a grassy lawn next to a newly built hotel across from the Olympic Park at the 2014 Winter Olympics on Thursday, Feb. 6, 2014, in Sochi, Russia.
REUTERS
A sign with the slogan 'please don't throw toilet paper into the toilet' is pictured at the media toilets of the ski jump venue at the Russki Gorki venue in the Rosa Khutor alpine resort near Sochi, on Thursday, Feb. 6, 2014.
REUTERS
International Olympic Committee President Thomas Bach (right) hands over the 2014 Sochi Olympics torch to United Nations Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon on Thursday, Feb. 6, 2014, as the torch relay arrived in Sochi, Russia.

SOCHI, Russia — The room is just fine, thanks.

Funny, but it's seemed that the loudest roar leading into these Olympics, which formally begin Friday with the Opening Ceremony, has been about, of all things, accommodations. Specifically those of journalists.

Here's guessing your chain-emailing uncle has spammed you with that viral pic of the two-toilet stall all week. Or the glass of yellow water. Or the linen-free bed. Or you've independently read the firsthand account of an inconvenienced journalist or two or three. Some were scary, some hilarious.

No doubt every last tale was true, too. I've heard a few myself since arriving Wednesday.

But I'm going to type this, and I couldn't care less who it ticks off: The Sochi Games have been, out of my four Olympics covered, by far the best organized to this point. Comparing to my only other Winter Games, they're putting Vancouver to shame.

The facilities are new, clean and typically spectacular in design and functionality. Sure, a ton of that is the result of the outrageous $51 billion budget, but the complaints haven't been about cost efficiency. They've been about organization. And from the tight ring of venues in Olympic Park to a logical flow to all movement, it's eminently evident that real thought has been applied.

The transport is so much better than any recent Olympics that it's no contest. There are dedicated bus lines for the first time since Beijing, modern and timely trains, and, of course, the $9 billion of new roads, bridges and tunnels. Speaking only for myself, the commute in Vancouver from hotel to media center averaged an hour and a half, mostly on sardine-packed public rail. Here, it's 12 minutes by bus.

The security, which obviously weighs above all else, has shown to be the right blend of expansive — upwards of 40,000 uniformed officers — and non-intrusive at the street and event levels. The uniformed officers aren't brandishing machine guns or being overbearing. It's hard to find long lines anywhere. The screening technology now includes identifying chips in our credentials and state-of-the-art body/equipment sensors. (The reported hacking of laptops and phones is reprehensibly intrusive, but I'll repeat this is about organization.)

Apparently, I'm not alone in this broader sentiment.

The U.S. Olympic brass opened its pre-Games press conference Thursday with this from CEO Scott Blackmun: “We've been very happy. People will always focus on details early. Once the action begins, I'm sure the story will change.”

Other nations and athletes echoed that en masse.

Understand, please, this is neither political nor social commentary on the Russian government, Vladimir Putin or any of their principles or practices, from human rights to anti-gay laws to the Sochi government's mass killing of stray dogs.

Nor, for crying out loud, is all this to suggest nothing will go wrong. All it will take is one terrible act to call everything into question.

All I'm saying is that this image of Sochi of being this bumbling overall operation looks to be ridiculously overblown. And in all candor, some of it's come across as if people are looking to bury these Games before the torch is even lit. As if they'd be delighted to see it all fail.

Maybe it's the history.

Russia remains something of a frenemy to America, but we're only a couple of generations removed from schoolchildren being taught where to take shelter when the Soviet Army starts dropping bombs. I'm a born-and-bred Pittsburgher, but I'm of Serbian heritage. Trust me, that stuff takes centuries, not decades, to heal. If it ever does.

Maybe it's the Russian way or attitude.

I'm not just referring to Putin and all his biceps-baring bravado. I'm talking about Anatoly Pakhomov, mayor of Sochi, declaring that there will be no issue with homosexuals because “we do not have them in our city.” The man had a billion ways to address that topic, and he still found the most inflammatory. I'm talking about Alexei Sorokin, director of Sochi's top pest control firm, referring to the stray dogs as “biological waste.”

The Russian bear doesn't like to be poked. It bites back first, thinks later. Or never.

Anyway, so yeah, the room's fine. It's small, but it's got a clean bed, a desk big enough for a laptop and fresh latte from downstairs, a little flat-screen, even a cute balcony.

All told, I'm anticipating the smoothest logistics I've known at any Olympics.

Don't mean to interrupt the narrative and run, but I've got a bus to catch.

Dejan Kovacevic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at dkovacevic@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Dejan_Kovacevic

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.