By Dejan Kovacevic| Tuesday, Feb. 11, 2014, 3:30 p.m.
SOCHI, Russia — The United States still awaits a hero.
Shaun White stumbled and nearly cracked his snowboard Tuesday in his bid to become the first Winter Olympian with three consecutive gold medals in the same event. He finished fourth in the halfpipe, an unthinkable result in the sport the carrot-topped kid from San Diego put on the map.
“It's tough,” a disconsolate White told reporters at Rosa Khutor Park. “I really wanted to win, but it wasn't my night.”
White hasn't been alone. As Day 5 of the Sochi Olympics passed, the American contingent has yet to find its first truly memorable moment. There have been two golds among the overall medal count of seven — the latter figure ranking seventh — but both came in snowboarding, a sport the U.S. has long dominated.
Otherwise, Bode Miller bombed on the downhill after commanding the trial runs, Julia Mancuso settled for bronze after leading the super-combined, and several of the rest of the more famous athletes expected here were hurt. Notable among them were skier Lindsey Vonn and figure skater Evan Lysacek.
There's no shame in the U.S. performance to date. For example, Erin Hamlin's luge bronze Tuesday was the first American medal of any kind in singles. Moreover, some of the Americans' best events are ahead, notably speedskating and bobsled. They're still expected by most experts to win the medal count.
But the Olympics are about legends, about treasured moments.
Maybe the first will come Wednesday, when Shani Davis tries for his third consecutive gold in the 1,000 meters of long-track speedskating. No one before him had ever won two. If he succeeds, he'll make a powerful case for being one of America's greatest Olympians.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.