U.S. women fall to Canada in late collapse
TribLIVE Sports Videos
SOCHI, Russia — There is no numerical measurement for pain, not in time, not in distance. But it's safe to say the 25 members of the U.S. women's hockey team won't soon recover from their agonizing 3-2 overtime loss to Canada in the Olympic gold medal game Thursday at Bolshoy Ice Dome.
Not from the left post of an empty net they hit from 150 feet while holding a two-goal lead with two minutes to go.
Not from the fluky goal off an American knee that pulled Canada within one, then the tying strike from Marie-Philip Poulin with 55 seconds left.
Not from the bizarre officiating in overtime.
And certainly not from Poulin's finishing dagger on a controversial power play at 8:10.
“Great hockey games come down to inches, bounces of the puck. It's high-risk, high-reward,” U.S. coach Katey Stone said. “There's nothing you can say right now to take the sting away.”
Several American players openly sobbed, some on the rink, more once they left.
“It hurts,” forward Kendall Coyne said. “It's tough to swallow.”
Canada's gold was its fourth in a row in a sport that essentially has only these two teams competing for it, the rest of the world still terribly far behind. That has created a rivalry perhaps unlike any other in the Winter Olympics, one that over the past winter spilled over into two fight-filled exhibitions.
Even in the handshake line after this game, the players moved briskly through. They couldn't be seen speaking or making eye contact.
But once that was done, the Canadians celebrated in a manner befitting a team that had just pulled off one of the great comebacks in the history of the Games.
“We always believed,” forward Hayley Wickenheiser said.
The U.S. built its 2-0 lead on goals by Meghan Duggan in the second period and Alex Carpenter early in the third. That appeared solid until about halfway through that period, when the Americans — whether Stone intended or not — suddenly went passive. Canada's Brianne Jenner scored at 16:34 to make it 2-1.
Stone told her players before the game, “Grab the moment, or it will grab you,” and it became painfully clear which came to pass.
“We certainly put ourselves in a position to win and didn't finish the job,” Stone said afterward. “I'm proud of our players. They left it out there.”
In overtime, the U.S. was awarded a power play for a crosscheck by Canada's Catherine Ward, but it was nullified six seconds later by a slashing penalty on Jocelyne Lamoureux, who chopped once at the goaltender's pads for what she thought might be a rebound.
That turned into a 4-on-3 power play when the Americans' Hilary Knight was issued a cross-checking penalty while chasing down a tired Wickenheiser on a partial break. Replays, though, showed no contact.
“A bogus call,” Knight said.
Stone declined comment on either overtime penalty.
Less than a minute later, Poulin capped a sharp passing play by firing into the vacant side of Jessie Vetter's net.
Julie Chu, a forward who went through all four Olympic losses, said she told the team afterward: “There's nothing to be ashamed of. Be proud of the way we played. Be proud of the team we are.”
The U.S. won gold in the first Olympic women's tournament, 1998 in Nagano, and it'll be at least another four years for that drought.
Dejan Kovacevic is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @Dejan_Kovacevic.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Foreign influx in Allegheny County at ‘tipping point’
- Adams couple faces fight in quest to drill on land near Mars schools
- Cedar Point attraction mishap injures 2 riders
- Steelers hope group of low-budget cornerbacks can deliver
- LaBar: Cesaro is WWE’s next Cinderella story
- Former Gateway coach Smith is ‘perfect fit’ for Penn State football staff
- Steelers notebook: Ben believes rookie WR Bryant can contribute
- Steelers WR Wheaton wants to produce after injury-plagued rookie year
- Observers mixed on grid backup amid carbon rules, natural gas uncertainty
- Inside the ropes: Roethlisberger may have his big receiver
- Pirates notebook: Hurdle, Huntington on same page