ShareThis Page

Kiski Valley Legion advances to District 31 semifinals

| Friday, July 8, 2016, 10:09 p.m.

Looking to break a long streak of early playoff exits, Kiski Valley turned to JJ Brestensky to pitch the deciding game of its District 31 American Legion opening-round playoff series with West Hempfield and he delivered.

Brestensky pitched a complete game to help No. 2 Kiski Valley advance to the semifinals for the first time since 2008 in an 11-6 victory Friday at Freeport Community Park.

Kiski Valley (19-5-1) won the series 2-1 and advanced to play Murrysville. Game 1 of the semifinals is 1 p.m. Sunday at Freeport Community Park.

Brestensky put up five straight scoreless innings before giving up three runs in each of the final two innings.

The Vikings gave Brestensky plenty of early run support, scoring four in the bottom of the first and three in the second.

Tyler Grosholz, Jordan Weaver and Jon Thomas all doubled for Kiski Valley.

Jordan Fiedor homered for No. 7 West Hempfield (13-11-1) and Justin Liberty tripled.

All-Star game

East 8, West 3 — Valley Legion's Noah Aftanas had two hits and Jeremy Iellimo added one to help the East division defeat the West in the Butler County American Legion All-Star game at Kelly Automotive Park in Butler.

Valley's Jordan Frame, Jake McNabb, Mike McNabb and Anthony Guzzo also participated in the All-Star game. BCABL's version of Kiski Valley, which is not affiliated with the Kiski Valley team that plays in District 31, had six representatives in the game — Tanner Bierly, Brian Komoroski, Connor Smotzer, Nick Sofaly and Nick Madz.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.