Share This Page

Riverhounds fall to Wigan in Frank B. Fuhrer International Friendly

| Friday, July 19, 2013, 10:24 p.m.
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
The Pittsburgh Riverhounds' Darren Amoo fights for the ball with Wigan Athletic's James Perch on Friday, July 19, 2013, at Highmark Stadium.
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
The Pittsburgh Riverhounds' Seth C’deBaca struggles for control of the ball with Wigan Athletic's Grant Holt on Friday, July 19, 2013, when the Riverhounds hosted an exhibition match with Wigan Athletic at Highmark Stadium.
Andrew Russell | Tribune-Review
The Pittsburgh Riverhounds' Louis Rolko heads the ball over Wigan Athletic's Grant Holt on Friday, July 19, 2013, when the Riverhounds hosted an exhibition match with Wigan Athletic at Highmark Stadium.

It took Jose Angulo three minutes to do what Manchester City couldn't in 90.

The Riverhounds striker scored the game's first goal, and while it wasn't enough to get a shocking result, it provided an exciting start to a 4-1 win for visiting Wigan Athletic in the Frank B. Fuhrer International Friendly at Highmark Stadium on Friday.

Wigan, which won the English FA Cup last season with a 1-0 win over Manchester City, got goals from Roger Espinoza, Emerson Boyce, Grant Holt and Jordi Gomez to end its preseason tour of the U.S. with a 3-0 record.

“Everyone was smiling, everyone was happy,” Riverhounds CEO/player Jason Kutney said. “It was one of the greatest applauses after the game that we've had this year, and I think it was out of respect for the game of soccer, more than anything else.”

The exhibition was the first international match to be played at Highmark Stadium, and not even a 20-minute lightning delay quieted a sellout crowd that got even louder after Angulo's goal. Angulo made a strong individual run to carry the ball into the left side of the penalty area, and his left-footed shot skimmed the bottom of the crossbar and fell into the net.

“When you strike a ball well, you don't even feel it,” Angulo said. “It just felt like a goal. It's a great feeling.”

“When he put that ball in, it made every ounce of effort that went into this game well worth in,” Kutney said.

Espinoza, a Honduran international and former Ohio State player, tied the game in the 11th minute with a left-footed shot from 25 yards, and Boyce put Wigan ahead before halftime by heading in a free kick from Ben Watson. The second-half goals by Holt and Gomez gave Wigan the type of score they wanted before returning to England, where they begin their season on Aug. 3.

“We were very fortunate to get to come into Highmark Stadium, which is such a scenic setting to begin with,” Wigan manager Owen Coyle said. “But we realized we came here with a job to do, in terms of discipline and organization. When we have that, as you've seen tonight, we have terrific quality.”

The Hounds nearly had a second goal when trailing 3-1 after halftime, but Jhonny Arteaga's finish into the right corner of the net was called offside.

“We played very well. We had a couple of chances where we could've tied the score before half, but we got everybody in the game,” Hounds head coach Justin Evans said. “All-in-all, it was very entertaining.”

Matt Grubba is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at mgrubba@tribweb.com or via Twitter @Grubba_Trib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.