ShareThis Page

Senior Players Championship notebook: A heavier lift at Fox Chapel

| Friday, June 27, 2014, 7:18 p.m.

Unlike Thursday's first round at the Senior Players Championship at Fox Chapel Golf Club, the golfers weren't allowed to lift, clean and place — except the par-4, 14th hole where much of the fairway near the green had been under water. Yet, the leaders were able to attack the soft greens.

“There's still a little bit of debris on the ball,” said Doug Garwood, whose 9-under total puts him two shots behind leader Bernhard Langer. “Of course, you couldn't put it up on a nice fluffy lie so it made the irons a little bit tougher, but not too bad.”

The rough, which was wet and heavy Thursday, wasn't nearly as difficult to negotiate during the second round.

“It's drying out somewhat, so I expected them to play the ball up again to let it dry out,” Langer said. “Most balls just plug or roll a foot or two, so I'm surprised we played the ball down.”

From alternate to contender

Peter Fowler followed a first-round 65 with a 2-under 68 on Friday to keep alive his improbable chances of winning the year's third major. Fowler, among three alternates, replaced Dan Pooley in the field.

Suddenly, he has a shot to surprise everyone as Joe Daley did two years ago. If Fowler is feeling the pressure, the heat may have turned up a bit down the stretch as he bogeyed the par-4 16th and the par-5 closing hole, which surrendered the third most birdies (24) in the first round.

“I played a few weeks in Australia and New Zealand, just some small regional stuff which are good fun and a chance to work on my game,” Fowler said. “I had a couple of injuries and operations on my knees, so that slowed me down for a few months this year.

“I've just been working flat out for about a month. So, I think that's really helped me.”

The ups and downs

With a chance to capture their first wins this season, Tommy Armour III and Joe Durant produced largely uneven rounds while other contenders blistered a still-defenseless Fox Chapel Golf Club.

Armour birdied four of five, then bogeyed four of five to finish with an even-par 70. Durant, coming off one of his best rounds of the year, opened with consecutive birdies — including a birdie on the par-5 second where his eagle putt lipped out.

Durant, who rallied for a 2-under 68, and Armour dropped nearly every makeable putt in the first round. On Friday, their rounds were doomed by poor putting.

Allen back into contention

Just a day after posting a pedestrian 68, Michael Allen recorded six second-round birdies and no bogeys to improve to 8-under for the tournament and to within three strokes of Langer.

Allen entered the tournament averaging the Champions Tour's sixth-lowest score per round this season. He has also had success at Fox Chapel in the past, tying for fourth place at last year's Senior Players.

Along with placing himself in better position with his irons, Allen attributed his Day 2 surge to a course that plays long, straight and rather accommodating to his booming season drive average of 278.7 yards.

“It's not extremely hard off the tees, so I feel like I can get it in play,” Allen said. “I'm getting myself a lot of good opportunities off the tee.”

Quick notes

A bad back forced Nick Price to withdraw after he posted a second-round 73. ... Greensburg native Rocco Mediate fired an even-par 70 to fall eight shots behind Langer.

Ralph N. Paulk and Andrew Erickson are staff writers for Trib Total Media. Reach Paulk at and Erickson at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.