Share This Page

Dominant players to meet in Men's Future finals

| Saturday, July 5, 2014, 5:33 p.m.
Emily Harger | Tribune-Review
American Jean-Yves Aubone returns the ball to Great Britain's Liam Broady in the PNC Men's Futures of Pittsburgh semifinals Saturday, July 5, 2014, at the Mt. Lebanon Tennis Center. Aubone won 6-2, 6-4.

Standing near the baseline after losing a lengthy rally to Jean-Yves Aubone in the second set of his semifinal match Saturday, Liam Broady forced a frustrated compliment.

“You're so talented,” Broady shouted at Aubone, drawing laughter from the crowd at Mt. Lebanon Tennis Center.

Broady was just a day removed from winning the doubles title at the Men's Futures of Pittsburgh and displayed plenty of athleticism in his first three singles matches, but the talent and consistency of Aubone were too much for the 20-year-old Brit in a 6-2, 6-4 decision that sent Aubone to Sunday's championship match.

Aubone wasn't overpowering Saturday afternoon so much as error-free. The first four games of the semifinal match reached deuce, but the 26-year-old former Florida State Seminole won three of the games by keeping rallies alive and forcing Broady to make mistakes.

“I will say (Broady) did miss more than what I was expecting,” Aubone said. “In certain moments, that made me say, ‘Let's just get another ball in play, give him a chance to miss instead of forcing it.'”

Broady was more accurate with his first serves in the second set, producing shorter points and requiring Aubone to land more high-risk, high-reward shots, but he said his focus carried him through to the end of the match.

Aubone has faced very little resistance on his way to the championship match, losing just one set — to Texas A&M's Jeremy Efferding on Friday — in four matches. Still, he knows he can't rest on his laurels, and with good reason.

Toby Martin, who defeated Hunter Harrington of Clemson 6-4, 6-2 in the first semifinal of the day, has dominated each of his four opponents and has not yet dropped a set in the tournament.

Martin, 21, likewise has risen above the field by forcing his opponents to beat themselves. Winning long rallies seemingly at will this week has him bursting with confidence as he looks ahead to Sunday's final, which is at 10:30 a.m.

“I just feel like they're going to have to play pretty exceptional tennis to beat me,” Martin said. “I feel like if we play into a rally, nine times out of 10 I'm going to win it.”

An enjoyable living situation in Pittsburgh also has Martin convinced he won't psych himself out prior to his biggest match of the tournament.

“The family I'm staying with, they're the best family I've ever met,” Martin said. “It's good because I can get a lot of tennis, chill out, have good fun and go from there.”

For all his success at Mt. Lebanon Tennis Center, Aubone said he knows what he's up against. The two have only played each other in a doubles match two weeks ago in Buffalo, but Aubone said he has been keeping an eye on the red-hot Martin all week.

“I know he's a good player, and I know he's on a roll right now,” Aubone said. “If he's on, I know it's going to be tough, but hopefully he's not.”

Andrew Erickson is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at aerickson@tribweb.com.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.