Share This Page

Shea, Trueblood top Brentwood runners at Firecracker 5K

| Wednesday, July 9, 2014, 9:00 p.m.

Sam Shea and Clara Trueblood were the top borough competitors at the 31st annual Brentwood Firecracker 5K Run held last week on Brownsville Road (see story on page 26).

Shea, a borough winner in 2011 and 2012, and Trueblood claimed the titles from Drew Wissler and Carly Brickett, last year's borough winners. Trueblood was followed by Emily Ianachione, who repeated as runner-up after earning a borough championship in 2012.

Overall, Shea, who is a Brentwood High School graduate, secured sixth place in the male 30-34 age division, while Trueblood placed seventh in the female 30-34 age division.

The top competitors from Brentwood in this year's 5K event were as follows:

MALE RUNNERS

• Sam Shea, 34 (19:17)

• Neil Christopher, 19 (20:20)

• Justin Mondry, 17 (20:22)

• David Betz, 17 (20:47)

• David Yankovich, 39 (20:57)

• Jeff Colligan, 32 (21:05)

• Andrew Eisenbarger, 22 (21:16)

• Anto Andric, 48 (21:47)

• Luke Benedik, 15 (21:48)

• Trent Uhlemann, 15 (22:05)

• Tom Cranmer, 33 (22:18)

• Chris Zanetti, 28 (22:39)

• Roger Gaughan, 50 (22:40)

• Darrin Abate, 37 (22:42)

• Lucas Ivers, 14 (23:10)

FEMALE RUNNERS

• Clara Trueblood, 31 (22:31)

• Emily Ianachione, 24 (23:15)

• Megan Dutka, 38 (24:15)

• Callee Suvak, 31 (24:23)

• Alayna Ziegler, 14 (24:42)

• Angelina Stimmel, 31 (25:12)

• Carly Cunningham, 24 (25:41)

• Kimberly Jones, 28 (26:17)

• Judy Dominici, 56 (26:31)

• Dorothy Rigby, 31 (26:33)

• Meredith Graham, 28 (26:40)

• Abby Dehler, 27 (27:03)

• Carrie DuMars, 28 (27:45)

• Megan Bullers, 29 (28:01)

• Hannah Kostyak, 13 (28:02)

Ray Fisher is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-388-5820 or rfisher@tribweb.com.

Related Content
TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.