Daily Courier roundup: Two DNL teams grab semifinal series lead
South Park and Quinn Construction grabbed 2-1 leads in the best-of-five semifinal-round series of the Daily News League baseball playoffs Tuesday night.
Following a day off Wednesday, both series will resume Thursday.
At South Park's Evans Field, Adam Dodson drove in three runs, and Ben Nolan pitched five effective innings for South Park, which scored in each of the first four innings and beat South Hills, 10-4.
The teams will meet in Game 4 at 6:15 p.m. at Mellon Middle School in Mt. Lebanon.
Dodson's two-run double with two outs helped South Park to a 3-0 lead in the first. South Park scored two more runs in the second with two outs.
Carter Grote's two-run double keyed a three-run fourth for South Park, increasing its lead to 9-1.
South Park finished with 13 hits.
Nolan gave up one run and five hits, walked four and struck out five for South Park, which got three hits from Dodson and two each from Anthony Monaco and Logan Corrigan.
Brandon Whitfield hit a two-run homer in the sixth, and Jon O'Neill had two hits for South Hills.
At Jefferson Hills' Beedle Park, Corry Ryan bested Nick Opherman in a pitchers' duel to lead Quinn Construction to a 3-2 victory over Clancy's Pub.
Game 4 of the series is scheduled for 6 p.m. at Beedle Park.
Ryan overcame a bases-loaded jam in the sixth inning after giving up a pair of runs on consecutive two-out RBI doubles by Zack Galasso and Mark Tripson. Ryan then escaped runners on first and third with one out in the seventh.
Tony Kostelnik and Jim Pasquine had two hits apiece for Quinn Construction, which took a 2-0 lead in the first on an RBI double by Pasquine and Dan Campbell's sacrifice fly.
Quinn Construction stretched the lead to 3-0 in the second on an RBI single by Kostelnik.
Tripson and Mike Hustava had two hits each for Clancy's Pub.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.