Share This Page

Fox Chapel golfer Diethrich prepares for Pennsylvania Open

| Sunday, Aug. 10, 2014, 9:57 p.m.

Davis Diethrich was a quiet but effective contributor for the Fox Chapel golf team the past two years. He hopes to quietly be a factor this week in his first Pennsylvania Open.

Davis is one of 62 amateurs competing in the 54-hole event, which carries a $40,000 purse and is set for Monday through Wednesday at the Country Club of York. The remainder of the players in the 120-man field are professionals.

“Going up against the pros won't be easy, but I am looking forward to it,” Diethrich said. “I am looking forward to testing my game.”

Diethrich, who will play at Rollins College in Winter Park, Fla., shot 71 in an Open qualifier at Greensburg Country Club. He was 3-under and leading through nine holes.

“I wasn't expecting much at the qualifier but played well,” he said. “The cut was at 73. There are so many good players in this field. It doesn't seem like too many younger guys; a lot of older pros. I just want to hold my own.”

Diethrich missed the cut in both the West Penn Open and West Penn Amateur.

Diethrich made sure colleges knew who he was. He sent out about 40 letters to prospective teams, and Rollins took the bait. He'll leave for Florida after the state Open.

The low 40 players and ties make the cut after 36 holes. The winner gets the Arnold Palmer Trophy.

Other players with All-Kiski Valley ties include Joe Boros of Saxonborg, Fox Chapel's Bob Friend, Oakmont pro Bob Ford, Oakmont member Spencer Mellon, Riverview grad and Brown senior Justin Miller, Kiski Area graduate Aaron Williams and Knoch grad Stefan Carlsson.

Jeannette's Ronald DeNunzio had to withdraw because he qualified for the U.S. Amateur.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.