Gold medalist Angle says wrestling won't vanish from Olympics
Kurt Angle, one of the most decorated wrestlers in Western Pennsylvania history, is optimistic that wrestling will survive a threat to its standing as an Olympic sport.
An International Olympic Committee recommendation to drop wrestling after 2016 shocked and galvanized the wrestling community. It prompted a shakeup in FILA, the wrestling international federation, and produced unlikely alliances such as one between the United States and Iran.
The two, as well as Russia and Japan, are among the countries in the newly formed Save Olympic Wrestling.
“Thank God we have a president (Nenad Lalovic) that is going to stand up for the sport,” said Angle, who won a gold medal at the 1996 Summer Olympics in Atlanta. “He knows what he has to do to bring wrestling back. We have been arrogant and ignorant.”
Wrestling has reorganized its governing structure so it can better market the sport and improve FILA's relationship with the IOC.
The IOC executive committee's recommendation to drop wrestling will be voted on by the general assembly in September.
“Wrestling has received the message, and we'll make the necessary changes to improve our sport and make it a better member of the worldwide Olympic family,” said Jim Scherr, a former head of the United States Olympics Committee who is working to improve wrestling's relationship with the IOC.
Wrestling is one of eight sports that has applied for inclusion in the 2020 Olympics.
“You want to remain in the Olympics so these kids have a goal and a dream,” said Angle, a Mt. Lebanon graduate.
Scott Brown is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @ ScottBrown_Trib.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.