ShareThis Page

Frye: Is Pennsylvania on verge of chronic wasting disaster?

| Saturday, March 11, 2017, 11:00 p.m.

Pennsylvania Game Commission officials have said for years they want to get a handle on chronic wasting disease while they can.

Might it be too late, or nearly so?

In states like West Virginia and Wisconsin, CWD kind of percolated for a while, then exploded, said Wayne Laroche, director of the commission's bureau of wildlife management. There might be some early signs of that happening here, he added.

Forty-seven wild CWD-positive deer were found in the state since 2012. Twenty-five turned up in 2016.

“This is an exponential curve,” Laroche said. “It's not prevalence. It's just the number of animals. But it's not a good sign.”

All that's with test results from nearly 3,900 hunter-killed whitetails and several road kills — the prime source of sick deer to date — still pending.

That's scary, admitted commission executive director Matt Hough.

“Unless effective control measures can be found, we expect that the number of infected deer will continue to grow exponentially,” he said.

One “control measure” the commission has been talking about for two winters is targeted shooting.

Laroche said previously he would like to go into the core area for the disease in wild Pennsylvania deer — namely 11 townships within Bedford and Blair counties in disease management area 2 — and do some targeted removal. That means taking out family groups of deer using sharpshooters hunting over bait at night.

The idea, he said, is to limit the spread of disease.

Game commissioner Dave Putnam wants to get moving on that.

“We may still have an opportunity to contain this disease to some extent, the prevalence of it,” Putnam said. “My two cents is to get on it as fast as we can.”

The agency apparently is going to take that advice.

Laroche said he's met with sharpshooters from the U.S. Department of Agriculture about doing some targeted removal before the end of March. The hope, he said, is to try it on a small scale and work out how the commission will shoot deer, how and where it will store them while testing is done, how it will dispose of any deer that turn out to be CWD-positive, and how it will distribute those that don't to food banks.

“We're moving forward,” Laroche said. “It's a lot slower than we'd like it to be. But we're moving.”

In the meantime, commissioners announced in January they likely won't offer disease management area 2 permits this fall, saying they were too much a “broad-scale approach.”

Instead, they're encouraging landowners in the 11 townships to take additional antlerless deer using the deer management assistance program.

They might also create doe tags good for those townships alone, to allow those who have permission to hunt locally to remove a few extra deer.

“I'd like to see that happen this year,” said board president Brian Hoover of Delaware County. “I think that's going to help us a lot.”

Bob Frye is the Tribune-Review outdoors editor. Reach him at 412-216-0193 or See other stories, blogs, videos and more at

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.