ShareThis Page

Two area hunters take monster bucks

| Tuesday, Dec. 4, 2012, 10:44 p.m.

Neither Michael Charlton nor Greg McVay has been hunting bucks this past week.

Not because they aren't deer hunters but because they got their bucks already. Their stories, though, couldn't be more different.

Charlton, 28, of Charleroi, is what you might call the more consistent of the two. He hunted every morning and evening during archery season, logging more than 300 hours in his tree stand. McVay, 57, of Moon Township, was in his stand virtually every day this fall, too, but that's relatively new for him.

He returned to hunting two years ago, having quit the sport for decades after an employee was killed in a bear season accident.

Yet, both scored big — Charlton on a deer no one had ever seen before, McVay on a familiar local legend.

“Believe it or not, I was after two other deer that I knew were in my area. I'd been chasing those two particular deer for three years,” Charlton said.

“This deer, I had no idea he was there. I had no trail camera pictures of him, nothing. He was absolutely a surprise. A terrific surprise, but a surprise.”

“This” deer was a 10-point with a 20 12-inch inside spread to his antlers that followed a mature doe into an opening.

His rack green-scored at 161 12. That's more than enough to put it into the Pennsylvania Game Commission's record book, as well as the Pope & Young Club's.

“The pure size of everything about this deer was huge,” Charlton said.

McVay, meanwhile, had been watching his buck for two years, long enough to nickname it, “Brutus.” He was never able to get a shot at it, though, despite seeing it nine times this year.

“Once they get into the rut, though, that's when they get a little stupid, I guess,” McVay said. “He was following a doe, and that was his downfall.”

The buck stepped from behind a tree and McVay took him. It was only when he walked up to the deer that he realized the deer had 19 points at least one inch long, along with a half dozen shorter ones.

A taxidermist green-scored the buck's rack at 167. If that holds up, the buck would rank among the top 25 non-typicals ever taken in the state with a bow.

“I was shocked because for all the times I'd seen him, I didn't know he had all those little kicker points all over the place,” McVay said. “I knew he was big, but I didn't expect that.”

There's definitely one thing the two hunters have in common. They both got what might be the deer of their lifetimes this fall.

“If I never kill one bigger, I'll be perfectly fine, knowing I'm always going to have this one,” Charlton said.

Bob Frye is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at or 724-838-5148.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.