Share This Page

Game Commission looking to ban wild boar

| Monday, Dec. 31, 2012, 1:54 p.m.

The Pennsylvania Game Commission is taking aim at wild boars.

The agency is preparing to move forward with regulations that would remove protection from the animals statewide and, most notably, ban their importation, possession and release into the wild. If approved by the board, the importation of hogs would be banned in July of 2013, and possession of them in July of 2014.

“This is major. There will be no more feral swine canned hunts in Pennsylvania,” said commissioner Jay Delaney of Luzerne County.

Commission executive director Carl Roe proposed that very idea this past spring in an executive order. It went out for public comment and generated quite a bit, most of it from the owners of hunting preserves who said boars are an important commodity.

Commission staff argued that those concerns don't outweigh the risk boars present, though.

“Feral swine are not native to Pennsylvania and present many problems to wildlife and people,” reads the commission's official position statement on hogs. “They can cause tremendous damage to habitat and property, and pose an ever-present threat to wildlife and the biosecurity of the state's multi-million-dollar pork industry. Pennsylvania would be a better place without these swine, and the Game Commission is committed to their eradication.”

Other states have struggled with wild hogs, which can reach weights in the hundreds of pounds. Texas, for example, is home to an estimated 2.6 million of them, and a 2004 survey said they cause $52 million in agricultural damage annually.

Wild hogs – escapees from preserves – have been found in a number of counties across Pennsylvania. The Game Commission wants to keep them from getting established or spreading, which is why the regulations are being proposed, Roe said.

Defining what is a wild board versus a feral swine or a pig “will become the challenge, to be very honest with you,” he added, given that the commission has jurisdiction over the former, the state Department of Agriculture jurisdiction over the latter. But he's hoping common sense will come into play.

“Does it look like a domestic pig and is it behind a fence, or does it look like what's been roaming the countryside the last couple of years, with hair and tusks? It's the reasonable-person approach,” Roe said.

The state is home to about 20 to 30 preserves that offer hog hunts, said Cal DuBrock, director of the commission's bureau of wildlife management.

Bob Frye is a staff writer for Trib Total media. He can be reached at bfrye@tribweb.com or 724-838-5148.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.