Other states see good, bad in hosting elk herd
Some other states are learning what Pennsylvania knows: having elk means lots of tourist dollars but some challenges, too.
The Maryland Legislative Sportsmen's Caucus and Maryland Department of Natural Resources have been looking into reintroducing elk into Garrett and Allegheny counties, just over the southwestern Pennsylvania border. The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation commissioned Responsive Management to determine what that would mean economically.
Its report said that bringing back elk — which last roamed Maryland in the 1700s — would generate about $4.2 million each year in tourism, create 41 jobs and generate almost $240,000 in local and state taxes, among other things.
The experience of another state is showing that elk can present problems, too.
Kentucky wildlife officials are wrestling with what to do with elk that damage farm crops, get hit by vehicles on roads and expand into residential areas. For the past three years, the answer has been to let farmers and other property owners shoot “nuisance” animals. That pilot program is set to expire, though, and state wildlife commission officials are not sure whether to continue it.
Some people want not only that, but to allow for the shooting of bull elk.
A recent column on piebald and white deer caught the attention of Crystal McCalmont, specifically because she's had piebald deer living in her neighborhood for several years.
She's seen three piebald over the last three years — one each year — in her area of Harmar Township, she said. The one spotted this fall, seemingly a fawn from spring, has been running with a doe and another small yearling.
Whether it will still be around next year is a question. The previous two piebalds in the area moved on or succumbed, she said.
“They don't seem to make it through winter,” she said.
River of the year
The Youghiogheny was Pennsylvania's river of the year in 2008. Last year it was the Stonycreek in Cambria and Somerset counties.
The Schuylkill is the frontrunner for 2013, with the Monongahela, Lackawanna, Kiskiminetas, Swatara and Juniata also in the running. Voting is under way at www.pawatersheds.org/vote.
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.