Indiana deer among largest ever, but 'pick-up' records highlight ones that got away
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Michael Shumaker will be the first to tell you he didn't shoot the big whitetail hanging on his wall.
The deer is a beauty. It's got a non-typical rack with 19 points that scored 1942/8. Only 21 non-typicals rank higher in Pennsylvania record books dating more than a century.
And all it took Shumaker to get the deer was a backtag.
He and fellow Latrobe resident Don Bushey where hunting in Indiana County on the last day of the firearms deer season in 1999 when they came upon the buck lying in the woods, near the edge of a golf course and a road. It already was dead and obviously had been for several days.
“I honestly think someone shot this deer at night, and it got away,” Shumaker said. “Any hunter that had shot this deer legally would have hired the Army National Guard to find it. It was that big. I've never seen one like it.”
With less than two hours left in the season and having yet to kill a deer, Shumaker tagged the buck and made it his.
The buck is the No. 1 — and only — non-typical buck ranked in the Pennsylvania Game Commission's record book in the “pick-up” category for whitetails found dead.
There are 28 typical pick-up bucks in the state record book, though. The largest, entered by Calvin Rippey of Butler, scored 1692/8, putting it in the top 40 all-time in the state.
Finding such deer is unusual but not unheard of. Sometimes the biggest bucks fall to poachers, get hit by cars or just outwit hunters long enough to die from something else. That was made clear again this past week courtesy of a big buck in Indiana.
A hunter named Tim Beck shot the non-typical in November. Its official score — as confirmed by the Boone and Crockett Club on Thursday — was 3057⁄8.
“It's only the third hunter-killed whitetail to ever score more than 300 inches and will be the second largest hunter-killed whitetail we've ever seen,” said Justin Spring, assistant director of big game records for the club, whose records date to 1830.
But it's only the fourth-largest non-typical recorded. The reason?
The two biggest non-typicals of all-time are both pick-up deer.
The largest is a Missouri buck found in 1982. No cause of death for it was determined. But the 51⁄2-year-old deer's rack, which weighed more than 11 pounds, scored 3337⁄8. The No. 2 non-typical was hit by a train in Ohio in 1940. It scored 3282/8.
All told, Boone and Crockett has 1,321 “pick-up” whitetails in its record books.
“We do get a lot of pick-up heads. Most of them don't reach the very top of any size category. They're more likely to fall somewhere between the middle and bottom,” Spring said.
But there are exceptions to the rule, and not just with deer.
The No. 1 hunter-killed black bear was shot in Pennsylvania. But it's not the highest-scoring black bear. That would be one found dead, apparently of natural causes, in Utah in 1976.
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources biologists, meanwhile, are again this winter tracking a female black bear that's known from aging one of its teeth — they contain rings like a tree — to be 39 years old. It's the oldest bear of any species recorded anywhere in the world.
“That just goes to show you how wary some of these animals are,” said Bob D'Angelo, coordinator of the big game records program for the Game Commission. “Animals like that, to be wary enough to evade hunters for all the years it takes to get really big, that's something.”
Shumaker's buck lived a long while and might have made it even longer if not perhaps for a poacher. He wishes it had made it long enough for him to take it himself. But it looks good on the wall either way.
“Better to be lucky than good, I guess,” he said.
Bob Frye is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @bobfryeoutdoors.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.
- Changes made to senior lifetime fishing licenses
- Fish and Boat Commissioners not settled on wild vs. stocked trout
- Outdoor notices: July 21, 2014