Share This Page

Game Commissioners set doe license allocation

| Monday, April 15, 2013, 8:39 p.m.

HARRISBURG — Pennsylvania's deer seasons are going to look similar this fall to last, although there will be fewer doe licenses available to hunters in places.

Game commissioners on Monday gave final approval to seasons and bag limits for 2013-14. The same 11 wildlife management units that featured 12 days of concurrent buck and doe hunting in the firearms deer season last year will be run that way again. Twelve — counting the one new unit, 2H — will be managed with a split season, with five days of buck-only hunting followed by seven days of concurrent.

That's what the board preliminarily adopted back in January.

Where commissioners veered was in deciding how many doe licenses to issue.

The board had recommendations from its biologists for each unit. It went away from those on occasion, however.

Biologists had recommended the board issue 51,000 doe tags for wildlife management unit 2C, for example. That unit takes in all of Somerset County and parts of Westmoreland, Fayette, Indiana, Cambria, Bedford and Blair.

The herd there is admittedly down compared to six years ago but has been relatively stable for the last four, said biologist Chris Rosenberry. The recommended allocation would maintain it at existing levels, he said.

Board president Bob Schlemmer of Export — who was not at the meeting, but relayed his suggestions to the board — recommended the commission issue just 36,000.

Not everyone agreed that was a good idea.

“I have some concerns about that,” commissioner Dave Schreffler of Bedford County said.

The board split the difference and allocated 43,000 doe licenses for 2C.

The board likewise compromised on unit 2D, which takes in all of Armstrong County and parts of Butler, Westmoreland, Indiana, Jefferson, Venango and Clarion. Rosenberry had suggested issuing 65,000 doe licenses; Schlemmer proposed 57,000. The board settled on 61,000.

The tags issued for other units are: unit 1A, 49,000; 1B, 31,000; 2A, 49,000; 2B, 62,000; 2E, 22,000; 2F, 29,000; 2G, 28,000; 2H, 6,000; 3A, 23,000; 3B, 39,000; 3C, 35,000; 3D, 32,000; 4A, 28,000; 4B, 24,000; 4C, 27,000; 4D, 35,000; 4E, 26,000; 5A, 19,000; 5B; 50,000; 5C, 103,000; and 5D, 18,000.

Bob Frye is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at bfrye@tribweb.com or via Twitter @bobfryeoutdoors.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.