Really, everyone should have seen this coming.
In school, as a sophomore at Albert Gallatin High School, 16-year-old Adam Burke carries a 4.5 grade-point average while taking advanced placement classes. When he raced quarter horses, he rose to rank fourth in the nation among his peers.
So when he took up trap shooting, of course he excelled.
He was recently named Rookie of the Year in the youth division for 2012 by “Trap and Field,” the official magazine of the Amateur Trapshooting Association.
“When he does something, he does it well,” said his mother, Nancy Burke.
His rise was impressive. He's not been a lifelong shooter; neither of his parents shoot at all. He only got involved after one of his horses died, in fact.
But when he made up his mind to give it a try through the local 4-H program, he went all in.
“It became addicting,” Burke said. “I started shooting 100 targets a week, then it got to be 400 targets on my peak weeks. I just couldn't get enough.”
At Fayette Gun Club, his home range, he met Joe Kislan of Connellsville, a sporting clays instructor. He credits Kislan with turning him into a better shooter.
Kislan said other trap-specific instructors helped. But Burke's attitude was the key to his growth, he said.
“He was an excellent student, just excellent. You showed him something once, and he did just that. He struggled a bit at first, but he had the desire to get better and improve his shooting skills,” Kislan said.
The Pennsylvania State Shoot is the largest trap shoot in the state — and one of the largest of its kind in the country — each year.
Burke recorded his first perfect score there, breaking 100 consecutive targets on his way to winning 18 awards.
“It's hard work, and it takes time, but it pays off in the end,” Burke said.
Bob Frye is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @bobfryeoutdoors.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.