Frye: Safety record belies worries
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Gun owners know what it means to deal with misconceptions.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control, you're more likely to die in a vehicle accident or from poisoning than you are by being shot. Yet there are no lawmakers trying to tell you how many SUVs or cans of Drano you can own.
Sadly, that's expected these days.
What's just as unfortunate is that sometimes, as sportsmen, we don't trust one another.
Remember a decade ago, when the Pennsylvania Game Commission instituted concurrent buck and doe seasons? Some hunters predicted mayhem. “If it's brown, it's down” was their fear. Overeager hunters would rush to pull the trigger before safely identifying their target, leaving bodies to litter the woods.
It didn't happen.
So why do some game commissioners still think we're such a danger to ourselves?
I got to wondering that recently when the commission released its latest report on hunting accidents. It turns out last year was the safest on record in Pennsylvania. There were just 33 accidents, none of them fatal. That's the first time that's been true since they began keeping records in 1915.
That's also reflective of a long-term trend. Accidents have declined by 80 percent since hunter education became mandatory in 1959.
Yet when given the chance earlier this year to open squirrel hunting season in mid-September — as does every state that touches Pennsylvania, mainly to create opportunity for young hunters — the majority of commissioners balked. The chance of a squirrel hunter shooting a camouflaged archer in a treestand when there are leaves on trees was too great, they said.
According to the commission's own statistics, not one archer was shot by a squirrel hunter between 2003-12, said agency spokesman Travis Lau.
Moving opening day of the squirrel season to mid-September would not change that, based on the experiences of other states. Ohio, New York, Maryland and West Virginia all have squirrel and archery seasons that overlap, starting as early as Sept. 7 in Maryland and before the end of September in the others. None has experienced a single case of a squirrel hunter shooting an archer, according to spokesmen.
“I've been on here for 24 years, and I can't recall any incidents like that,” said Sgt. Brian Albert, public information officer with the Maryland Department of Natural Resources.
“We have no record of any bowhunter being shot by a squirrel hunter at any point in time that we have memory of,” said Vicki Ervin, spokeswoman for the Ohio Department of Natural Resources.
So why the unreasonable fear that hunters couldn't replicate that kind of safety record here? There are no statistics to support such a worry.
It's too late for commissioners to change their decision for this fall. But for the sake of future generations of hunters, let's hope they do the right thing and craft an earlier season in time for next year.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.