It sounds like something from a 1950s horror film.
An alien species moves in and, slowly but insidiously, begins to take over. In time, it dominates the planet. Other species are wiped out.
What might be called Pennsylvania's “attack of the killer crayfish” isn't quite that bad, but it's serious enough that Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission officials will consider some changes to what kind of bait you can use.
The problem is that several invasive varieties of crayfish, most notably the rusty and virile, have been introduced into a number of waters, including the Susquehanna River, Spring Creek and Fisherman's Paradise.
Most native crayfish species exist at densities of one to two per square foot of stream bottom. Invasives populate streams at densities of 20 per square foot, said Dave Lieb, invertebrate zoologist in the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission's natural diversity section.
That's bad not only for the native crayfish they displace, but also the plants, aquatic insects and fish eggs they eat, and even the fish, birds and mammals that might try to prey on them, he said. Invasive crayfish eat more, grow faster, and quickly become too large to be prey. That leads to fewer, and slower growing, fish.
“The bottom line is you end up with lots of exotic crayfish and less of just about everything else,” Lieb said.
Invasives are hard to remove once they become established, so preventing them from spreading is the key, he said. The good news is the only way they get from one water to another is via people.
“It's not all gloom and doom in this state in that there's time to do something about it,” Lieb said.
What commission staff will propose is banning the possession, sale and transportation of all species of crayfish unless the head has been removed behind the eyes.
Bob Frye is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at email@example.com or via Twitter @bobfryeoutdoors.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.