ShareThis Page

Raccoon Creek's upper pond looks good for bass

| Monday, July 29, 2013, 10:48 p.m.

Mention fishing at Raccoon Creek State Park in Beaver County, and most people probably think of its 101-acre lake or perhaps Traverse Creek.

The former is home to largemouth bass, bluegills and crappies, not to mention the occasional walleye. Both get stocked with trout.

The park's “upper lake” or “upper pond” is comparatively as anonymous as its nondescript name would suggest. That's not to say it's not worth fishing, though.

Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission biologists from the Area 8 office in Somerset earlier this summer surveyed the pond for the first time since 2002. They found largemouth bass, bluegills, pumpkinseeds, crappies and carp — “all of your typical small-pond species,” biologist Mike Depew said.

The panfish were abundant but small. One-third of the 110 bluegills handled, for example, were less than 6 inches long, Depew said.

The bass are another story.

Biologists collected 34 in less than 30 minutes. That extrapolates out to 75 bass per hour, about double the benchmark for a good bass lake, Depew said.

Of the 34, 20 were longer than 12 inches and seven were longer than 15.

“We had one of 21 inches that we landed. And we saw another, bigger one that we missed. I guess it would have gone 22 or 23 inches,” Depew said.

“So there were some nice bass in there. For someone looking for a small-pond experience, it's pretty good.”

Park manager Al Wasilewski could not be reached for comment. But fishing at the pond is catch-and-release only, according to state park rules.

The pond — 8 acres now, though perhaps half of it is very shallow and being reclaimed by nature as a wetlands, Depew said — is accessible by walking a gated road near the intersection of Cabin and Nichol Road.

Bob Frye is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at or via Twitter @bobfryeoutdoors.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.