ShareThis Page

Battle on the horizon in Pennsylvania over endangered species

| Sunday, Sept. 8, 2013, 10:32 p.m.

State agencies, environmentalists and the federal government are raising alarms about proposed legislation that could significantly change the laws that protect threatened and endangered species in Pennsylvania.

The legislation would give the Independent Regulatory Review Commission a role in the process of listing or delisting threatened or endangered species and in listing Wild Trout streams. The state Game Commission and the Fish and Boat Commission have exclusive authority for birds, animals, fish and other species.

The two bills, one in the Senate and one in the House, would ultimately make it harder to keep species on a threatened or endangered list and make it “nearly impossible” to add new species, said George Jugovic, a lawyer with the environmental group Penn Future.

State Rep. Jeff Pyle, an Apollo Republican and the lead sponsor of the House bill, said he's concerned the public has “no possible way to contest” decisions by the state commissions.

“A second set of eyes never hurts,” Pyle said.

Developers may face additional restrictions when a parcel of land is listed as habitat for a threatened or endangered species.

Pyle said he was motivated to file the legislation when a school district had to spend $61,000 to compensate for building in an area where a species of endangered bat lives.

Game Commission spokesman Travis Lau told The Associated Press that the agency had “no involvement whatsoever” in that case and the $61,000 was for a federal endangered species program.

Jugovic noted that the Independent Regulatory Review Commission “has no particular scientific background” to make decisions about threatened species, but the Game Commission and the Fish and Boat Commission “have spent decades protecting fish and animals.”

The legislation, Jugovic said, is “plainly an attempt to undercut the authority” of the two commissions to list species, and the very independence of those commissions may be what bothers politicians the most.

The state programs are separate from federal endangered species listings and are often used to manage species that are threatened in a particular region but perhaps not nationally. Pennsylvania lists 21 birds and animals as endangered and seven as threatened, along with about 60 fish, amphibians and invertebrates.

Carl Roe, executive director of the Game Commission, told legislators last month that the new system could take longer, use up more staff time and jeopardize federal grants. He also said the legislation was not addressing an existing problem since the Game Commission added only three species to the lists over the past 10 years.

The legislation has some powerful backers. Senate President Pro Tempore Joseph Scarnati, R-Jefferson, introduced one version this year.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.