Archers are excited about getting back to hunting on airport land
TribLIVE Sports Videos
The hunters picking up their permits to bow-hunt deer on airport land felt lucky to get one, but two longtime friends felt particularly fortunate.
“We've been wanting to hunt in there for years,” Peter Fick, 70, of Neville said on Monday at Pittsburgh International Airport. He and Mike Panko, 69, of Coraopolis have been friends since the sixth grade and began hunting together in the 1960s.
Nearly 3,000 people applied for permits to hunt on more than 2,300 acres west of the airport between Saturday and Jan. 11. The Allegheny County Airport Authority picked 157 “winners” during a public random drawing on Sept. 26, meaning Fick and Panko beat long odds to both snag one.
Panko said they hunted in the area years ago, before construction of the airport in the early 1990s and other development reduced access.
“After 9/11 is what put the real damper on it,” he said.
One of the main attractions is the likelihood of finding larger deer.
“Any time you haven't had a lot of hunting in the area, you have a chance to get a quality animal,” Panko said.
Manny Martinez, 52, of Imperial said that's what led him to apply for a permit.
“Just the possibility of what you might call a ‘monster' buck makes it too enticing to pass up,” he said.
Tom Fazi, education officer for the Pennsylvania Game Commission's Southwest Region, said that's part of the attraction for hunters whenever an area is opened to hunting.
“That area is known to produce large deer anyway,” he said. “We've always had big deer come out of Allegheny County.”
The authority set up the pilot program to determine whether hunting can thin the deer population on the airport's land. The hunting area is separated from the runways and terminal by no-hunting areas and the Parkway West.
When the hunters pick up their permits, they are given a map and briefed on areas where hunting is prohibited, including Findlay's community park and the Montour Trail spur that leads from the airport to the main hiking and biking trail.
Several of the hunters have asked permission to bring along people who would help them put up tree stands and carry out deer, said Scot Ben, a safety manager.
Authority spokesman Jeff Martinelli said the authority is working on a policy that accounts for the needs of permit holders but keeps the program “fair for the people who didn't get a permit.”
The main concern is that people will bring in helpers who actually are additional hunters, he said.
Ben said several of the younger permit holders have volunteered to help other permit holders with stands and deer.
So far, 83 people have picked up their permits and two have declined. It's possible that other people will decline or fail to pick up their permits, Martinelli said. In the latter case, the authority will attempt to contact them to see whether they are still interested, he said.
The authority randomly selected 40 numbers for an alternate list during the lottery and will offer unused permits to those people in the order that they were drawn, he said.
The permit holders still have to follow all state hunting regulations, including the applicable seasons for hunting bucks and does in Wildlife Management Unit 2A, which covers the hunting area on the airport's property.
Michael Bossola, 40, of Richland said he hasn't hunted on the land before but has checked out aerial maps.
“From what I hear, it's pretty deer-populated,” he said.
Like the other hunters, he plans to hunt in other areas as well, but the opening of a new archery-only area was particularly welcome.
“I'm a big archery hunter. That's all I do,” he said.
Fazi of the game commission said he hopes the program is a success and that the airport will expand it in the future.
“Any time we can get more access to hunters, it's a good thing,” he said.
Brian Bowling is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. He can be reached at 412-325-4301 or email@example.com..
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.