Game Commission to look for quail
Unable to get wild pheasants, the Pennsylvania Game Commission is shifting some of its focus to bobwhite quail.
Speaking at the agency's quarterly board meeting in Delmont on Monday, Cal DuBrock, director of the bureau of wildlife management, said the commission will not be getting any wild pheasants from South Dakota or any other states to release onto its wild pheasant recovery areas this fall.
The recovery areas are places where the commission and sportsmen volunteers from Pheasants Forever worked to create pheasant habitat. The plan was to stock them with imported wild birds and close them to hunting in an attempt to jump-start a local population.
But there are no birds to be had this year. South Dakota and other states have seen their own pheasant numbers decline as a result of recent harsh winters, making them hesitant to share any of what's left, DuBrock said.
One result is that the commission is going to shift some of its attention to bobwhite quail.
The agency adopted a quail management plan in October 2011 that called for figuring out if and where wild bobwhite quail remain in the state and developing ways to bring populations back. In the two years since, none of that work has been done.
Commissioner Jay Delaney of Luzerne County on Monday again asked why that is.
A lack of resources is the answer, DuBrock said. The commission hasn't had the people or money to do much with quail, he said.
But he added the commission is hoping to get started on the quail plan soon, primarily by contracting with outside researchers to document whether there are any quail in Pennsylvania, where they are, and whether they are wild birds or captive ones stocked for dog training purposes.
“We're trying to get a pulse on where we are before we leap forward to where we're going,” he said.
Delaney said he's eager for that work — for any quail work — to get started.
“I think personally it should be prioritized,” he said.
Bob Frye is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at firstname.lastname@example.org or via Twitter @bobfryeoutdoors.
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments â either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.