Wildlife conservation officer Brian Singer up for national award
TribLIVE Sports Videos
Brian Singer likes — make that loves — working as a wildlife conservation officer in eastern Westmoreland County for the Pennsylvania Game Commission.
If you doubt that, just ask him.
“I don't plan on leaving. They'll have to drag me out of here,” Singer said. “I call it the crown jewel district, one of the best in the state.”
He's going on the road temporarily, though.
Singer recently was chosen as Pennsylvania's wildlife law enforcement officer of the year by the National Wild Turkey Federation. He is heading to Nashville, Tenn., this week for the group's annual convention, which begins Thursday and runs through Sunday.
There, he'll be in the running to become the federation's top officer for the nation for 2014.
If he wins — and no Keystone State officer has — it will be well deserved, said Tom Fazi, information and education supervisor in the commission's southwest region office, and the man who patrolled eastern Westmoreland County before Singer.
“For a relatively young officer, with only a few years in the field, he has a skill set that's very highly developed,” Fazi said. “He does a very good job at law enforcement, and he's a terrific investigator. He's great at putting cases together.”
Singer wasn't even aware he had been nominated as Pennsylvania's officer of the year until he won.
“It's nice from the point of view of having your supervisors recognize your work,” Singer said. “It's good to know they're paying attention and care. It keeps your motivation high.”
Singer is a native of the Scranton area. He went Kutztown University before enrolling in the commission's training school. He was assigned to his district upon graduation and has been there for almost four years.
It's no surprise he already is earning accolades, Fazi said.
“He's an excellent officer,” Fazi said.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.