Changes made to senior lifetime fishing licenses
TribLIVE Sports Videos
The Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission took a first step toward raising new money, albeit one not everyone within the agency agreed.
At their recent quarterly meeting, commissioners decided by an 8-2 vote to require all those who buy senior lifetime fishing licenses after Jan. 1, 2015, to also have to buy an annual trout stamp. Those who have purchased a lifetime license prior to that time will be exempt.
The move might raise as much as $338,000 annually by year five, said Tim Schaeffer, deputy executive director for policy and planning.
The move is necessary because about 70 percent of senior lifetime license holders fish for stocked trout, said executive director John Arway. Those fish are expensive: They account for about 36 percent of the agency's fish fund budget.
Lifetime license holders — whose numbers are expected to grow — don't help pay that bill now, he said.
“We simply can no longer afford to allow anglers to fish for trout without paying for the annual permit,” Arway said.
Two commissioners, Ed Mascharka of Erie County and Glade Squires of Chester, voted against the proposal.
Mascharka said the rule creates two classes of lifetime license holders: those who have to buy an annual trout stamp and those who don't. More importantly, he said, it doesn't really fix anything.
“I was against it from the beginning due to the fact it's a short-term remedy for a few dollars. In fact, it's not a remedy at all,” Mascharka said.
“Three hundred thousand dollars is a drop in the bucket compared to what we need.”
The commission needs a lot more money, Arway agreed.
Like other state agencies, it's under orders from Gov. Tom Corbett to maintain a no-growth budget while simultaneously absorbing increases in mandated pension and health care costs, Arway said.
That means the commission needs $4.8 million in fiscal year 2014-15, $6.8 million in 2015-16 and $9.1 million in 2016-17. Arway said the commission either must generate new revenue or cut programs.
At the board's urging, Arway outlined four options for raising money with license fees.
Option one is to increase the cost of fishing license and trout stamp fees by a one-time, fixed amount: Option two is to increase the cost of trout stamps alone by a one-time, fixed amount: Option three is to increase fishing license and stamp fees incrementally, and option four is to decrease fees by $1.
None alone would generate the kind of money the commission needs, Arway said. The first two, if not the first three, surely would cause some anglers to quit fishing, he added.
Ultimately, outgoing board president G. Warren Elliott of Adams County asked three commissioners to develop recommendations for the board and report back, perhaps by the agency's fall meeting.
Show commenting policy
TribLive commenting policy
You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.
We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.
While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.
We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers.
We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.
We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.
We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.
We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.