ShareThis Page
Outdoors

Citizen science meets technology in unique herpetology survey

Bob Frye
| Saturday, Aug. 15, 2015, 7:21 p.m.
Volunteer Ed Patterson of the Pennsylvania Reptile and Amphibian Survey looks under rocks for salamanders at Pine Ridge Park near Blairsville on Aug. 10, 2015.
Sean Stipp | Trib Total Media
Volunteer Ed Patterson of the Pennsylvania Reptile and Amphibian Survey looks under rocks for salamanders at Pine Ridge Park near Blairsville on Aug. 10, 2015.

In what often seems to be an ever-shrinking world, there's still room for discovery.

Ed Patterson can speak to that.

Director of Indiana County's parks system, he has been prowling those and other lands with purpose of late. He's finding more than might be expected, too.

An admitted amateur when it comes to herpetology, he nonetheless has documented all kinds of reptiles and amphibians. His personal list includes more than a dozen species, including Wehrle's salamanders, seal salamanders, bullfrogs, pickerel frogs, eastern American toads, eastern ratsnakes and a queen snake.

He also has found, close to home, valley and ridge salamanders, which he never had seen and didn't know existed.

“A lot of these species, I didn't know anything about them before this. It's just a matter of looking and being observant,” Patterson said.

He and about 1,200 others statewide are looking in ways never done before through the Pennsylvania Amphibian and Reptile Survey. Begun in 2013, it's a 10-year joint project of the Pennsylvania Fish and Boat Commission and Mid-Atlantic Center for Herpetology and Conservation. Its goal is a lofty one: to figure out just which salamanders, lizards, frogs, toads, turtles and snakes live in Pennsylvania, where they live and in what numbers.

There are a lot of gaps in that knowledge, said Chris Urban, chief of the commission's natural diversity section.

“People think we know a lot of this. The reality is, we know very little about where some of these animals are,” Urban said.

The survey has three components.

One is to create an atlas, such as the statewide breeding bird atlases done here, of what's out there, Urban said.

What's great is that anyone can participate, and — unlike pre-smartphone era surveys — all finds can be verified, said Brandon Ruhe, president of the Mid-Atlantic Center.

Volunteers, from professional herpetologists to the most amateur naturalist, submit records by emailing a photo of their discovery, along with informationsuch as where it was found, the temperature and weather conditions, to the Survey website. Experts — three for every submission — confirm the identity of the creature involved. The information is then shared for all to see.

“It's kind of a neat project where old-school citizen science meets technology,” Ruhe said.

Going into the weekend, nearly 88,000 submissions had been verified.

“On a good day, we might get 100 records,” said Jason Poston of the South Hills, a longtime “herper” who also takes care of the project's website. “We've got a good base of volunteers.”

There have been some interesting finds.

The Cope's gray treefrog was thought to exist in Pennsylvania, but its presence never been documented. It has turned up in eight or nine counties in the past year, including Allegheny, Fayette, Greene, Washington, Westmoreland and Beaver. Never-before-confirmed Atlantic coast leopard frogs have been recorded, too, and Eastern smooth earthsnakes have been found for the first time since 1962.

The survey also is providing information on common species, and that's just as important, said Mark Lethaby, curator of the Natural History Museum at the Tom Ridge Environmental Center and a regional project coordinator.

“A lot of the historical records go back 100 years, and they've never really been updated. So we don't know if some species exist anymore. We don't know if some common species are still common. We don't know if some species we're finding in unusual places have expanded their range or if we're just finding them in places we didn't know they existed before,” Lethaby said.

“So this is definitely turning up a lot of new knowledge about the species in the state.”

A second component of the survey involves pulling all of the those historical reptile and amphibian records — widely scattered among universities and institutions — together so they can be compared with what's being found now, Urban said.

“We can look at all of that and say, ‘OK, a species was once here. Is it still there? And if it's not there, why is it not there? What happened to it?' That's important for making management decisions,” Urban said.

The project's third component involves forming teams of experts and sending them into the field to look specifically for the rarest species, he said.

Taken together, all three aspects of the study are vital, Ruhe said, because reptiles and amphibians have value for their own sakes and for utilitarian reasons.

“These animals are important parts of ecosystems. The more we do this, the more we learn, the more we help ourselves,” he said.

Patterson, who has become a volunteer coordinator with the survey, agreed. He knows this work is important, and he encourages people to get involved.

But he tells them it's fun making little discoveries, too.

“Reptiles and amphibians have always been kind of overlooked. It's been interesting trying to locate and document them,” Patterson said.

Bob Frye is a staff writer for Trib Total Media. Reach him at bfrye@tribweb.com or via Twitter @bobfryeoutdoors.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using TribLive.com you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.

click me