ShareThis Page

Deadline means defense for Penguins on trade market

| Friday, Feb. 26, 2016, 8:09 p.m.
Getty Images
The Flames' Kris Russell looks on before a faceoff against the Devils on Jan. 19, 2016, in Newark, N.J.

As the clock ticks steadily toward Monday's NHL trade deadline, general manager Jim Rutherford makes no bones about what's at the top of his shopping list.

He wants a defenseman.

With Ben Lovejoy out long term with an upper-body injury, the Penguins are down to six players with meaningful NHL experience on the blue line. That almost certainly will change before the deadline.

The only question, really, is where the new defenseman will fit on the depth chart.

“With the prices of top-four guys, which there are very few available, it's not necessarily going to be a top-four guy,” Rutherford said. “It may be a guy that's a depth guy. It may be a guy that can play in our top six. But we would like to add a defenseman prior to the deadline.”

From a financial perspective, the price the Penguins are able to pay for a defenseman is limited by the salary cap. Rutherford said the team can add about $2 million in payroll at the deadline.

From an organizational perspective, the Penguins are limited by their unwillingness to move one of the team's top three prospects. Rutherford said in no uncertain terms Friday that he does not want to trade goalie Matt Murray, winger Daniel Sprong or defenseman Derrick Pouliot at the deadline.

He also said the Penguins think next June's draft is deep, so they would prefer to hold on to the extra second-round pick they acquired from Vancouver in the Brandon Sutter trade last summer.

If the Penguins keep all those assets, the best they could hope to land is a defenseman who would provide injury insurance and perhaps push Ian Cole for the sixth spot on the depth chart.

If Rutherford decides to be a bit bolder, Calgary defenseman Kris Russell figures to be one of the deadline's top prizes. While he is not known to drive puck possession, Russell leads the league in blocked shots per game and averages about 22 minutes of ice time for the Flames. He makes $2.6 million on an expiring contract.

TSN reported Friday the Penguins have interest in renting Edmonton's Justin Schultz, a boom-or-bust offensive defenseman who seems to have worn out his welcome with the Oilers. He makes $3.9 million.

A defenseman with local ties also might be on the move by Monday. Vancouver reportedly is shopping Mt. Lebanon native Matt Bartkowski, who makes $1.75 million on an expiring deal. Bartkowski scored his fourth and fifth goals of the season as the Canucks beat Ottawa, 5-3, on Thursday night.

Jonathan Bombulie is a Tribune-Review staff writer. Reach him at or via Twitter at @BombulieTrib.

TribLIVE commenting policy

You are solely responsible for your comments and by using you agree to our Terms of Service.

We moderate comments. Our goal is to provide substantive commentary for a general readership. By screening submissions, we provide a space where readers can share intelligent and informed commentary that enhances the quality of our news and information.

While most comments will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive, moderating decisions are subjective. We will make them as carefully and consistently as we can. Because of the volume of reader comments, we cannot review individual moderation decisions with readers.

We value thoughtful comments representing a range of views that make their point quickly and politely. We make an effort to protect discussions from repeated comments either by the same reader or different readers

We follow the same standards for taste as the daily newspaper. A few things we won't tolerate: personal attacks, obscenity, vulgarity, profanity (including expletives and letters followed by dashes), commercial promotion, impersonations, incoherence, proselytizing and SHOUTING. Don't include URLs to Web sites.

We do not edit comments. They are either approved or deleted. We reserve the right to edit a comment that is quoted or excerpted in an article. In this case, we may fix spelling and punctuation.

We welcome strong opinions and criticism of our work, but we don't want comments to become bogged down with discussions of our policies and we will moderate accordingly.

We appreciate it when readers and people quoted in articles or blog posts point out errors of fact or emphasis and will investigate all assertions. But these suggestions should be sent via e-mail. To avoid distracting other readers, we won't publish comments that suggest a correction. Instead, corrections will be made in a blog post or in an article.